Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$10.67
Change+$0.81 (+8.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.81M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$130.40
Change+$7.85 (+6.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.31B
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. LZCOX (34.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.16) vs LZCOX (0.38). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.68 vs. LZCOX (-0.51). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 31.77 vs. LZCOX (-23.95).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.17 | 924% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.169 | 5.519 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.8M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.16 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.51 | 10.68 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.16 | 33.00 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.95 | 31.77 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.86 | 185.98 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement