Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.28
Change-$0.20 (-2.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.36M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. LZCOX (33.4M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.35) vs LZCOX (0.00). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (28 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. LZCOX (-18.24). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. LZCOX (-10.68).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.17 | 924% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.683 | -4.390 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.4M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.24 | 5.19 | -351% |
| Returns for 3 years | -15.79 | 31.28 | -50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.68 | 63.19 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -35.60 | 92.88 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement