Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.85
Change+$0.11 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.37M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.10
Change+$1.17 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. LZCOX (33.4M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.20) vs LZCOX (0.00). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. LZCOX (-16.31). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.48 vs. LZCOX (-6.18).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.17 | 924% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.197 | 6.199 | -84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.4M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.31 | 8.00 | -204% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.79 | 50.66 | -4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.18 | 71.48 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.16 | 148.14 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement