Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$9.58
Change-$0.29 (-2.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.91M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. LZCOX (32.9M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.22) vs LZCOX (0.00). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. LZCOX (-19.56). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. LZCOX (-19.49).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.17 | 924% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.005 | 6.726 | -74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.9M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.56 | 1.42 | -1,374% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.95 | 33.14 | -42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.49 | 48.22 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.91 | 137.58 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement