Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LZCOX vs NAESX
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts LZCOX vs NAESX
Lazard US Small Cap Equity Select Open
Price$10.22
Change+$0.20 (+2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.84M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$124.04
Change+$1.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
LZCOX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LZCOX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZCOX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. LZCOX (33.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than LZCOX: NAESX (1.21) vs LZCOX (0.00). LZCOX was incepted earlier than NAESX: LZCOX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). LZCOX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). LZCOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). LZCOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: LZCOX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.86 vs. LZCOX (-19.89). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 40.97 vs. LZCOX (-20.64).
| LZCOX | NAESX | LZCOX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.17 | 706% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.17 | 924% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.080 | 7.092 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.8M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.89 | -0.86 | 2,309% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.78 | 32.07 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.64 | 40.97 | -50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.42 | 131.34 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers