LZB
Price
$34.81
Change
+$0.86 (+2.53%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.43B
59 days until earnings call
SCS
Price
$17.09
Change
+$0.39 (+2.34%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.28B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZB vs SCS

Header iconLZB vs SCS Comparison
Open Charts LZB vs SCSBanner chart's image
La-Z-Boy
Price$34.81
Change+$0.86 (+2.53%)
Volume$490.37K
Capitalization1.43B
Steelcase
Price$17.09
Change+$0.39 (+2.34%)
Volume$2.46M
Capitalization2.28B
LZB vs SCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LZB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZB vs. SCS commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZB is a StrongBuy and SCS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LZB: $34.81 vs. SCS: $17.09)
Brand notoriety: LZB and SCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZB: 82% vs. SCS: 102%
Market capitalization -- LZB: $1.43B vs. SCS: $2.28B
LZB [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $1.43B. SCS’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $2.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $32.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $3.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSCS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LZB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCS is a better buy in the long-term than LZB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LZB is a better buy in the short-term than SCS.

Price Growth

LZB (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +3.29% price change this week, while SCS (@Home Furnishings) price change was +1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZB is expected to report earnings on Nov 25, 2025.

SCS is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-2.77% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCS($2.28B) has a higher market cap than LZB($1.43B). SCS has higher P/E ratio than LZB: SCS (21.36) vs LZB (15.97). SCS YTD gains are higher at: 47.261 vs. LZB (-18.764). LZB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 256M vs. SCS (243M). LZB has more cash in the bank: 319M vs. SCS (226M). LZB has less debt than SCS: LZB (502M) vs SCS (602M). SCS has higher revenues than LZB: SCS (3.22B) vs LZB (2.11B).
LZBSCSLZB / SCS
Capitalization1.43B2.28B63%
EBITDA256M243M105%
Gain YTD-18.76447.261-40%
P/E Ratio15.9721.3675%
Revenue2.11B3.22B65%
Total Cash319M226M141%
Total Debt502M602M83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LZB vs SCS: Fundamental Ratings
LZB
SCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5980
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8645
SMR RATING
1..100
7461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8040
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3529

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LZB's Valuation (22) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as SCS (31) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry. This means that LZB’s stock grew similarly to SCS’s over the last 12 months.

SCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LZB (86) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that SCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LZB’s over the last 12 months.

SCS's SMR Rating (61) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is in the same range as LZB (74) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that SCS’s stock grew similarly to LZB’s over the last 12 months.

SCS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LZB (80) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that SCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LZB’s over the last 12 months.

SCS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Office Equipment Or Supplies industry is in the same range as LZB (41) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that SCS’s stock grew similarly to LZB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZBSCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGLJX16.340.12
+0.74%
MFS Global Real Estate R1
HGICX51.710.21
+0.41%
Hartford Core Equity C
FCLTX52.05N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Industrials M
NAEFX73.63N/A
N/A
New Alternatives Investor
MDOBX11.31N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity C

LZB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZB has been closely correlated with ETD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LZB jumps, then ETD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZB
1D Price
Change %
LZB100%
+2.53%
ETD - LZB
71%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
PATK - LZB
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
AMWD - LZB
59%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
MLKN - LZB
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
MHK - LZB
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More

SCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCS has been loosely correlated with MLKN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCS jumps, then MLKN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCS
1D Price
Change %
SCS100%
+2.34%
MLKN - SCS
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
ACCO - SCS
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
ETD - SCS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
LZB - SCS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
MHK - SCS
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More