LZ
Price
$8.85
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
18 days until earnings call
MMS
Price
$71.02
Change
-$0.32 (-0.45%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.12B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LZ vs MMS

Header iconLZ vs MMS Comparison
Open Charts LZ vs MMSBanner chart's image
LegalZoom.com
Price$8.85
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$2.28M
Capitalization2.52B
MAXIMUS
Price$71.02
Change-$0.32 (-0.45%)
Volume$384.47K
Capitalization5.12B
LZ vs MMS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LZ vs. MMS commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LZ is a Hold and MMS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (LZ: $8.85 vs. MMS: $71.02)
Brand notoriety: LZ and MMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LZ: 138% vs. MMS: 93%
Market capitalization -- LZ: $2.52B vs. MMS: $5.12B
LZ [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $2.52B. MMS’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $5.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMS is a better buy in the long-term than LZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMS is a better buy in the short-term than LZ.

Price Growth

LZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -0.67% price change this week, while MMS (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZ is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

MMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+0.48% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMS($5.12B) has a higher market cap than LZ($2.52B). LZ has higher P/E ratio than MMS: LZ (191.57) vs MMS (27.27). LZ YTD gains are higher at: 17.843 vs. MMS (-4.054). MMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 472M vs. LZ (60.1M). LZ has more cash in the bank: 226M vs. MMS (104M). LZ has less debt than MMS: LZ (9.02M) vs MMS (1.48B). MMS has higher revenues than LZ: MMS (4.98B) vs LZ (661M).
LZMMSLZ / MMS
Capitalization2.52B5.12B49%
EBITDA60.1M472M13%
Gain YTD17.843-4.054-440%
P/E Ratio191.5727.27702%
Revenue661M4.98B13%
Total Cash226M104M217%
Total Debt9.02M1.48B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MMS: Fundamental Ratings
MMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
91
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZMMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGRQX42.400.13
+0.31%
MFS International Growth R2
DRLAX8.690.02
+0.23%
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - A
PWDCX9.890.01
+0.10%
Donoghue Forlines Dividend C
IVOIX19.340.01
+0.05%
Macquarie Mid Cap Income Opps I
TEMQX15.08-0.04
-0.26%
Franklin Mutual Quest C

LZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZ has been loosely correlated with UDMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZ jumps, then UDMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZ
1D Price
Change %
LZ100%
+0.11%
UDMY - LZ
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
MSA - LZ
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MMS - LZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
GPN - LZ
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BRC - LZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More

MMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMS has been loosely correlated with FA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMS jumps, then FA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMS
1D Price
Change %
MMS100%
-0.45%
FA - MMS
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
ICFI - MMS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
BRC - MMS
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
LZ - MMS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
ABM - MMS
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More