It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LYTS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileYNVYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LYTS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LYTS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +6.96% price change this week, while YNVYF (@Electronic Components) price change was +3.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.61%.
LYTS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
LYTS | YNVYF | LYTS / YNVYF | |
Capitalization | 610M | 13.9M | 4,388% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 46.735 | 74.572 | 63% |
P/E Ratio | 26.22 | N/A | - |
Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 27.2M | N/A | - |
LYTS | YNVYF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LYTS's Valuation (25) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as YNVYF (52) in the null industry. This means that LYTS’s stock grew similarly to YNVYF’s over the last 12 months.
LYTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for YNVYF (100) in the null industry. This means that LYTS’s stock grew significantly faster than YNVYF’s over the last 12 months.
LYTS's SMR Rating (56) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YNVYF (96) in the null industry. This means that LYTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than YNVYF’s over the last 12 months.
YNVYF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LYTS (38) in the Building Products industry. This means that YNVYF’s stock grew similarly to LYTS’s over the last 12 months.
LYTS's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for YNVYF (100) in the null industry. This means that LYTS’s stock grew significantly faster than YNVYF’s over the last 12 months.
LYTS | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYTS has been loosely correlated with ALNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYTS jumps, then ALNT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LYTS | 100% | -0.24% | ||
ALNT - LYTS | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
CTS - LYTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
LFUS - LYTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
BHE - LYTS | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
TEL - LYTS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that YNVYF and LYTS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YNVYF and LYTS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YNVYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
YNVYF | 100% | -22.43% | ||
LYTS - YNVYF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
TTDKY - YNVYF | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.74% | ||
TYOYY - YNVYF | 8% Poorly correlated | -7.04% | ||
VARXF - YNVYF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AAIRF - YNVYF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
More |