LYSFF
Price
$4.29
Change
-$0.07 (-1.61%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.49B
MLFNF
Price
$20.54
Change
-$0.48 (-2.28%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYSFF vs MLFNF

Header iconLYSFF vs MLFNF Comparison
Open Charts LYSFF vs MLFNFBanner chart's image
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
Price$4.29
Change-$0.07 (-1.61%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization2.49B
Maple Leaf Foods
Price$20.54
Change-$0.48 (-2.28%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.53B
LYSFF vs MLFNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYSFF vs. MLFNF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYSFF is a Hold and MLFNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (LYSFF: $4.29 vs. MLFNF: $20.54)
Brand notoriety: LYSFF and MLFNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYSFF: 103% vs. MLFNF: 11%
Market capitalization -- LYSFF: $2.49B vs. MLFNF: $2.53B
LYSFF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.49B. MLFNF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $2.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLFNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LYSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLFNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLFNF is a better buy in the long-term than LYSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYSFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLFNF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYSFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MLFNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYSFF is a better buy in the short-term than MLFNF.

Price Growth

LYSFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLFNF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.34% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLFNF($2.53B) and LYSFF($2.49B) have the same market capitalization . MLFNF has higher P/E ratio than LYSFF: MLFNF (555.56) vs LYSFF (7.93). MLFNF YTD gains are higher at: 45.674 vs. LYSFF (-2.278). LYSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.12B vs. MLFNF (-67.46M). LYSFF has more cash in the bank: 3.59B vs. MLFNF (79.4M). MLFNF has less debt than LYSFF: MLFNF (1.93B) vs LYSFF (9.44B). LYSFF has higher revenues than MLFNF: LYSFF (28.1B) vs MLFNF (4.79B).
LYSFFMLFNFLYSFF / MLFNF
Capitalization2.49B2.53B98%
EBITDA6.12B-67.46M-9,065%
Gain YTD-2.27845.674-5%
P/E Ratio7.93555.561%
Revenue28.1B4.79B587%
Total Cash3.59B79.4M4,515%
Total Debt9.44B1.93B488%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYSFF vs MLFNF: Fundamental Ratings
LYSFF
MLFNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
7081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSFF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MLFNF (28). This means that LYSFF’s stock grew similarly to MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLFNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (100). This means that MLFNF’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as MLFNF (81). This means that LYSFF’s stock grew similarly to MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

MLFNF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (59). This means that MLFNF’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSFF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as MLFNF (100). This means that LYSFF’s stock grew similarly to MLFNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYSFFMLFNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLFNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPYIX9.510.10
+1.06%
Touchstone Sands Capital Intl Gr Eq I
DTGRX68.490.45
+0.66%
BNY Mellon Technology Growth A
BRXVX15.740.10
+0.64%
MFS Blended Research Intl Eq R6
RWIEX70.650.39
+0.56%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R4
GCTCX43.880.21
+0.48%
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C

LYSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYSFF and NCHEY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYSFF and NCHEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSFF
1D Price
Change %
LYSFF100%
N/A
NCHEY - LYSFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - LYSFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
KRYAY - LYSFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
MRRTY - LYSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.40%
NFPDF - LYSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MLFNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLFNF and BRCC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLFNF and BRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLFNF
1D Price
Change %
MLFNF100%
-2.31%
BRCC - MLFNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
NCHEY - MLFNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRTY - MLFNF
0%
Poorly correlated
-7.40%
NCRA - MLFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFF - MLFNF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More