LYSFF
Price
$4.29
Change
-$0.07 (-1.61%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.49B
MAMA
Price
$7.94
Change
-$0.02 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
186.68M
101 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYSFF vs MAMA

Header iconLYSFF vs MAMA Comparison
Open Charts LYSFF vs MAMABanner chart's image
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
Price$4.29
Change-$0.07 (-1.61%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization2.49B
Mama's Creations
Price$7.94
Change-$0.02 (-0.25%)
Volume$390.17K
Capitalization186.68M
LYSFF vs MAMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYSFF vs. MAMA commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYSFF is a Hold and MAMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LYSFF: $4.29 vs. MAMA: $8.10)
Brand notoriety: LYSFF and MAMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYSFF: 153% vs. MAMA: 146%
Market capitalization -- LYSFF: $2.49B vs. MAMA: $186.68M
LYSFF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $2.49B. MAMA’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $186.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LYSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than LYSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MAMA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MAMA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LYSFF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +17.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.46% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSFF($2.49B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($187M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than LYSFF: MAMA (26.24) vs LYSFF (7.93). MAMA YTD gains are higher at: 1.759 vs. LYSFF (-2.278). LYSFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.12B vs. MAMA (9.86M). LYSFF has more cash in the bank: 3.59B vs. MAMA (5.56M). MAMA has less debt than LYSFF: MAMA (15.2M) vs LYSFF (9.44B). LYSFF has higher revenues than MAMA: LYSFF (28.1B) vs MAMA (96.4M).
LYSFFMAMALYSFF / MAMA
Capitalization2.49B187M1,330%
EBITDA6.12B9.86M61,999%
Gain YTD-2.2781.759-130%
P/E Ratio7.9326.2430%
Revenue28.1B96.4M29,149%
Total Cash3.59B5.56M64,478%
Total Debt9.44B15.2M62,132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYSFF vs MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
LYSFF
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3128
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10025
SMR RATING
1..100
5752
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSFF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAMA (89). This means that LYSFF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSFF (100). This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (57). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSFF (74). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LYSFF (78). This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than LYSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

LYSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYSFF and NCHEY have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYSFF and NCHEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSFF
1D Price
Change %
LYSFF100%
N/A
NCHEY - LYSFF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - LYSFF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.92%
KRYAY - LYSFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
MRRTY - LYSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
NFPDF - LYSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and NATR have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and NATR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
+4.92%
NATR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
JVA - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.97%
JBSS - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
LANC - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.02%
More