LYSDY
Price
$5.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.31B
NILIF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
64.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYSDY vs NILIF

Header iconLYSDY vs NILIF Comparison
Open Charts LYSDY vs NILIFBanner chart's image
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$5.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$54.61K
Capitalization4.31B
Surge Battery Metals
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$35.59K
Capitalization64.2M
LYSDY vs NILIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYSDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYSDY vs. NILIF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYSDY is a Hold and NILIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LYSDY: $5.49 vs. NILIF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: LYSDY and NILIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYSDY: 24% vs. NILIF: 9%
Market capitalization -- LYSDY: $4.31B vs. NILIF: $64.2M
LYSDY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $4.31B. NILIF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $64.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYSDY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNILIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LYSDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NILIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYSDY is a better buy in the long-term than NILIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYSDY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NILIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYSDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NILIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYSDY is a better buy in the short-term than NILIF.

Price Growth

LYSDY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.29% price change this week, while NILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSDY($4.31B) has a higher market cap than NILIF($64.2M). LYSDY YTD gains are higher at: 38.987 vs. NILIF (-28.824). LYSDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 617M vs. NILIF (-3.19M). LYSDY has more cash in the bank: 102M vs. NILIF (2.12M). NILIF has less debt than LYSDY: NILIF (18.4K) vs LYSDY (202M). LYSDY has higher revenues than NILIF: LYSDY (961M) vs NILIF (0).
LYSDYNILIFLYSDY / NILIF
Capitalization4.31B64.2M6,713%
EBITDA617M-3.19M-19,360%
Gain YTD38.987-28.824-135%
P/E Ratio11.48N/A-
Revenue961M0-
Total Cash102M2.12M4,811%
Total Debt202M18.4K1,097,826%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYSDY vs NILIF: Fundamental Ratings
LYSDY
NILIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4885
SMR RATING
1..100
8298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4386
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NILIF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYSDY (90). This means that NILIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYSDY’s over the last 12 months.

LYSDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NILIF (85). This means that LYSDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSDY's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (98). This means that LYSDY’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSDY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NILIF (86). This means that LYSDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSDY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NILIF (100). This means that LYSDY’s stock grew significantly faster than NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYSDYNILIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYSDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JTNB14.890.54
+3.76%
JTNB Bancorp Inc.
VWAGY10.990.02
+0.18%
Volkswagen AG
IACYF9.88N/A
N/A
Inter Action Corp. Yokohama
ZHUZY21.30N/A
N/A
Zhuzhou CRRC Times Electric Co., Ltd.
HUPHY3.94N/A
N/A
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust

LYSDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSDY has been closely correlated with LYSCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSDY jumps, then LYSCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSDY
1D Price
Change %
LYSDY100%
-0.09%
LYSCF - LYSDY
88%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
PILBF - LYSDY
50%
Loosely correlated
+9.60%
GLNCY - LYSDY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
BDNNY - LYSDY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
MALRY - LYSDY
43%
Loosely correlated
+7.44%
More

NILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NILIF has been loosely correlated with LYSCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NILIF jumps, then LYSCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NILIF
1D Price
Change %
NILIF100%
-1.31%
LYSCF - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
LYSDY - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
PILBF - NILIF
31%
Poorly correlated
+9.60%
PMETF - NILIF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
BDNNY - NILIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More