Advertisement
LYSDY vs MP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYSDY is a StrongBuy and MP is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LYSDY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LYSDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LYSDY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LYSDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LYSDY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.43% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
MP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.93% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| LYSDY | MP | LYSDY / MP | |
| Capitalization | 8.48B | 9.46B | 90% |
| EBITDA | 101M | -47.16M | -214% |
| Gain YTD | 113.165 | 242.179 | 47% |
| P/E Ratio | 1478.25 | 770.50 | 192% |
| Revenue | 482M | 233M | 207% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.94B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 997M | - |
LYSDY | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LYSDY | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 74% | 13 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 73% |
Advertisement
LYSDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSDY has been closely correlated with LYSCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSDY jumps, then LYSCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYSDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYSDY | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| LYSCF - LYSDY | 86% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| BHP - LYSDY | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
| RIO - LYSDY | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| PILBF - LYSDY | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| BDNNY - LYSDY | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||
MP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with UAMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then UAMY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | 100% | -2.13% | ||
| UAMY - MP | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| USAR - MP | 47% Loosely correlated | -7.02% | ||
| LYSDY - MP | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| FSUGY - MP | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| TMC - MP | 43% Loosely correlated | -10.50% | ||
More | ||||