LYSCF
Price
$9.37
Change
-$0.24 (-2.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.28B
87 days until earnings call
PGEZF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
57.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYSCF vs PGEZF

Header iconLYSCF vs PGEZF Comparison
Open Charts LYSCF vs PGEZFBanner chart's image
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$9.37
Change-$0.24 (-2.50%)
Volume$58.17K
Capitalization9.28B
STILLWATER CRITICAL MINERALS
Price$0.22
Change+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Volume$524.28K
Capitalization57.22M
LYSCF vs PGEZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGEZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYSCF vs. PGEZF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYSCF is a Hold and PGEZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LYSCF: $9.37 vs. PGEZF: $0.22)
Brand notoriety: LYSCF and PGEZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYSCF: 46% vs. PGEZF: 105%
Market capitalization -- LYSCF: $9.28B vs. PGEZF: $57.22M
LYSCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.28B. PGEZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $57.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYSCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePGEZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LYSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PGEZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYSCF is a better buy in the long-term than PGEZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYSCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGEZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGEZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGEZF is a better buy in the short-term than LYSCF.

Price Growth

LYSCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.11% price change this week, while PGEZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYSCF is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSCF($9.28B) has a higher market cap than PGEZF($57.2M). PGEZF YTD gains are higher at: 148.018 vs. LYSCF (133.666). LYSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 101M vs. PGEZF (-4.16M). LYSCF has higher revenues than PGEZF: LYSCF (482M) vs PGEZF (0).
LYSCFPGEZFLYSCF / PGEZF
Capitalization9.28B57.2M16,231%
EBITDA101M-4.16M-2,428%
Gain YTD133.666148.01890%
P/E Ratio1684.50N/A-
Revenue482M0-
Total CashN/A703K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYSCF vs PGEZF: Fundamental Ratings
LYSCF
PGEZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3087
SMR RATING
1..100
8798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3635
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYSCF's Valuation (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PGEZF (100). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGEZF (87). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as PGEZF (98). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

PGEZF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSCF (36). This means that PGEZF’s stock grew similarly to LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGEZF (98). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYSCFPGEZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGEZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPTL26.760.36
+1.36%
SPDR® Portfolio Long Term Treasury ETF
ISWN21.160.14
+0.68%
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
HSCZ37.050.05
+0.14%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF
SCUS25.180.02
+0.08%
Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
IUS54.30-0.04
-0.08%
Invesco RAFI™ Strategic US ETF

LYSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSCF has been closely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSCF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSCF
1D Price
Change %
LYSCF100%
-2.55%
LYSDY - LYSCF
88%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
BDNNY - LYSCF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
GLNCY - LYSCF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
PILBF - LYSCF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
GLCNF - LYSCF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More

PGEZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGEZF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGEZF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGEZF
1D Price
Change %
PGEZF100%
+2.82%
SLVDF - PGEZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
OMZNF - PGEZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.97%
AAGFF - PGEZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
IVPAF - PGEZF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
LYSCF - PGEZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More