Advertisement
LYPHF vs SCLX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYPHF is a Hold and SCLX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LYPHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCLX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LYPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SCLX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LYPHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCLX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LYPHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- SCLX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LYPHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SCLX (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was +20.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.03%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (+1.05% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| LYPHF | SCLX | LYPHF / SCLX | |
| Capitalization | 1.76B | 166M | 1,058% |
| EBITDA | 907M | -109.1M | -831% |
| Gain YTD | -22.025 | -57.384 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.23 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 5.2B | 46.7M | 11,135% |
| Total Cash | 5.51B | 3.92M | 140,525% |
| Total Debt | 9.49B | 128M | 7,415% |
| LYPHF | SCLX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 39% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 5% | 5 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 5% | 5 days ago 32% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 27% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RNGEX | 67.18 | 0.60 | +0.90% |
| American Funds New Economy R4 | |||
| OARDX | 26.54 | 0.22 | +0.84% |
| Invesco Rising Dividends A | |||
| TSPFX | 5.91 | 0.04 | +0.68% |
| Transamerica Small Cap Growth R4 | |||
| MXERX | 6.34 | 0.03 | +0.48% |
| Empower S&P SmallCap 600® Index Instl | |||
| SCIZX | 7.83 | 0.01 | +0.13% |
| Virtus SGA International Growth R6 | |||
LYPHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LYPHF and MRK have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYPHF and MRK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYPHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYPHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRK - LYPHF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.77% | ||
| OGN - LYPHF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| SNYNF - LYPHF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
| SCLX - LYPHF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CSWYF - LYPHF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SCLX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SCLX and CSWYF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SCLX and CSWYF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCLX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLX | 100% | +1.92% | ||
| CSWYF - SCLX | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BIIB - SCLX | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| AMRN - SCLX | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.48% | ||
| PFE - SCLX | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.24% | ||
| ABBV - SCLX | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||