LYG
Price
$4.88
Change
-$0.15 (-2.98%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.43B
97 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFG
Price
$6.78
Change
-$0.02 (-0.29%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
83.56B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYG vs MFG

Header iconLYG vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts LYG vs MFGBanner chart's image
Lloyds Banking Group
Price$4.88
Change-$0.15 (-2.98%)
Volume$255.05K
Capitalization73.43B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.29%)
Volume$67.51K
Capitalization83.56B
LYG vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
LYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYG vs. MFG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYG is a Buy and MFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LYG: $5.03 vs. MFG: $6.80)
Brand notoriety: LYG and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYG: 132% vs. MFG: 111%
Market capitalization -- LYG: $73.43B vs. MFG: $83.56B
LYG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $73.43B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $83.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LYG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LYG and MFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than LYG.

Price Growth

LYG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.57% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYG is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($83.6B) has a higher market cap than LYG($73.4B). LYG has higher P/E ratio than MFG: LYG (16.75) vs MFG (14.89). LYG YTD gains are higher at: 93.337 vs. MFG (39.059). LYG has less debt than MFG: LYG (85.4B) vs MFG (22.19T). MFG has higher revenues than LYG: MFG (3.61T) vs LYG (19.1B).
LYGMFGLYG / MFG
Capitalization73.4B83.6B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD93.33739.059239%
P/E Ratio16.7514.89112%
Revenue19.1B3.61T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt85.4B22.19T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYG vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
LYG
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2829
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
614
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
723
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (76) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LYG (83). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (14). This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LYG (5). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (43). This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (23). This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYGMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBEU48.400.32
+0.67%
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF
CIK2.84N/A
N/A
Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund
QQA53.80-0.06
-0.11%
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
KWEB39.32-0.27
-0.68%
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
AAPB34.12-0.47
-1.37%
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF

LYG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYG has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYG
1D Price
Change %
LYG100%
+0.60%
NWG - LYG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
SBNY - LYG
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BSAC - LYG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
DB - LYG
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
MFG - LYG
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+1.04%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+2.81%
HBAN - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.98%
DB - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
RF - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More