LYG
Price
$4.35
Change
-$0.03 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
64.12B
47 days until earnings call
MFG
Price
$6.51
Change
-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
81.62B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYG vs MFG

Header iconLYG vs MFG Comparison
Open Charts LYG vs MFGBanner chart's image
Lloyds Banking Group
Price$4.35
Change-$0.03 (-0.68%)
Volume$11.66M
Capitalization64.12B
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization81.62B
LYG vs MFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYG vs. MFG commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYG is a StrongBuy and MFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LYG: $4.35 vs. MFG: $6.51)
Brand notoriety: LYG and MFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYG: 122% vs. MFG: 70%
Market capitalization -- LYG: $64.12B vs. MFG: $81.62B
LYG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $64.12B. MFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $81.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LYG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LYG and MFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than LYG.

Price Growth

LYG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while MFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($81.6B) has a higher market cap than LYG($64.1B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than LYG: MFG (13.69) vs LYG (12.26). LYG YTD gains are higher at: 67.200 vs. MFG (33.129).
LYGMFGLYG / MFG
Capitalization64.1B81.6B79%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD67.20033.129203%
P/E Ratio12.2613.6990%
RevenueN/A3.61T-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A22.19T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYG vs MFG: Fundamental Ratings
LYG
MFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6972
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
815
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYG's Valuation (70) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (72). This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (15). This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LYG (5). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as LYG (46). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (25). This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYGMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAXX50.920.16
+0.31%
BondBloxx IR+M Tax-Awr Shrt Dur ETF
JSCP47.620.06
+0.13%
JPMorgan Short Duration Core Plus ETF
FCO6.65-0.02
-0.30%
abrdn Global Income Fund
SPYV54.44-0.27
-0.49%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
PLTW42.04-0.67
-1.58%
Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF

LYG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYG has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYG
1D Price
Change %
LYG100%
-0.68%
NWG - LYG
72%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
BSAC - LYG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
DB - LYG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
MFG - LYG
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
BCH - LYG
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.22%
More

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.46%
NWG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
DB - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
HBAN - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
WNEB - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
TFC - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More