LYFT vs PDFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFT is a Hold and PDFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LYFT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePDFS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PDFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LYFT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PDFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LYFT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PDFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LYFT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.32% price change this week, while PDFS (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
LYFT is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
PDFS is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-3.78% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| LYFT | PDFS | LYFT / PDFS | |
| Capitalization | 7.74B | 1.3B | 596% |
| EBITDA | -188.97M | 8.39M | -2,253% |
| Gain YTD | -11.008 | -20.458 | 54% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 417.50 | - |
| Revenue | 4.4B | 166M | 2,653% |
| Total Cash | 1.69B | 136M | 1,239% |
| Total Debt | 1.04B | 6.19M | 16,844% |
LYFT | PDFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 77 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LYFT's Valuation (86) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PDFS (90) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to PDFS’s over the last 12 months.
PDFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
PDFS's SMR Rating (100) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PDFS’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.
LYFT's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PDFS (89) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to PDFS’s over the last 12 months.
LYFT's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PDFS (95) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PDFS’s over the last 12 months.
| LYFT | PDFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 8 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 8 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | about 1 month ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 15 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 8 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 71% |
LYFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYFT has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LYFT jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LYFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYFT | 100% | -7.49% | ||
| QTWO - LYFT | 49% Loosely correlated | -5.97% | ||
| UBER - LYFT | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| DTSS - LYFT | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| SSNC - LYFT | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| ANSS - LYFT | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
More | ||||
PDFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDFS has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PDFS jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PDFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDFS | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| SNPS - PDFS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| ANSS - PDFS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| CDNS - PDFS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| GDDY - PDFS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| AMPL - PDFS | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
More | ||||