Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LYFCX vs SHSKX
LYFCX vs SHSKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LYFCX vs. SHSKX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYFCX is a Hold and SHSKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSKX has more cash in the bank: 6.68B vs. LYFCX (37.5M). LYFCX pays higher dividends than SHSKX: LYFCX (0.90) vs SHSKX (0.36). LYFCX was incepted earlier than SHSKX: LYFCX (6 years) vs SHSKX (9 years). LYFCX (2.88) is less costly to investors than SHSKX (0.75). LYFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. SHSKX (43.00). LYFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SHSKX: LYFCX (2500) vs SHSKX (5000000). LYFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.85 vs. SHSKX (-0.67). LYFCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.33 vs. SHSKX (-4.40).
| LYFCX | SHSKX | LYFCX / SHSKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 0.75 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.88 | 0.75 | 384% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.967 | 10.108 | 277% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.5M | 6.68B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.36 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.85 | -0.67 | -2,951% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.96 | 4.27 | 562% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.33 | -4.40 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement