LYBC
Price
$40.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
170.9M
MDIBF
Price
$21.92
Change
+$3.05 (+16.16%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
11.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LYBC vs MDIBF

Header iconLYBC vs MDIBF Comparison
Open Charts LYBC vs MDIBFBanner chart's image
Lyons Ban
Price$40.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$181
Capitalization170.9M
MedioBanca SpA
Price$21.92
Change+$3.05 (+16.16%)
Volume$182
Capitalization11.23B
LYBC vs MDIBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LYBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LYBC vs. MDIBF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LYBC is a Hold and MDIBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LYBC: $40.50 vs. MDIBF: $21.92)
Brand notoriety: LYBC and MDIBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LYBC: 30% vs. MDIBF: 65%
Market capitalization -- LYBC: $170.9M vs. MDIBF: $11.23B
LYBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $170.9M. MDIBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $11.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LYBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDIBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LYBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDIBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDIBF is a better buy in the long-term than LYBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDIBF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LYBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MDIBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYBC is a better buy in the short-term than MDIBF.

Price Growth

LYBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.53% price change this week, while MDIBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +16.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDIBF($11.2B) has a higher market cap than LYBC($171M). LYBC has higher P/E ratio than MDIBF: LYBC (10.20) vs MDIBF (8.43). MDIBF YTD gains are higher at: 37.429 vs. LYBC (0.873). LYBC has less debt than MDIBF: LYBC (20.9M) vs MDIBF (22.3B). MDIBF has higher revenues than LYBC: MDIBF (2.85B) vs LYBC (63.8M).
LYBCMDIBFLYBC / MDIBF
Capitalization171M11.2B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.87337.4292%
P/E Ratio10.208.43121%
Revenue63.8M2.85B2%
Total Cash22MN/A-
Total Debt20.9M22.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LYBC vs MDIBF: Fundamental Ratings
LYBC
MDIBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5413
SMR RATING
1..100
459
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4557
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYBC's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBF (72). This means that LYBC’s stock grew similarly to MDIBF’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYBC (54). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYBC’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYBC (45). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYBC’s over the last 12 months.

MDIBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LYBC (55). This means that MDIBF’s stock grew similarly to LYBC’s over the last 12 months.

LYBC's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MDIBF (57). This means that LYBC’s stock grew similarly to MDIBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYBCMDIBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVR301.080.56
+0.19%
Evercore
EICA24.620.03
+0.14%
Eagle Point Income Company
JRVR5.69N/A
N/A
James River Group Holdings Ltd
WKC28.22-0.12
-0.42%
World Kinect Corp
PMNT0.36-0.01
-3.33%
Perfect Moment Ltd

LYBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LYBC and BKIMF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LYBC and BKIMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYBC
1D Price
Change %
LYBC100%
N/A
BKIMF - LYBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHT - LYBC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSBI - LYBC
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSFG - LYBC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDIBF - LYBC
5%
Poorly correlated
+16.18%
More

MDIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDIBF has been loosely correlated with LSFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDIBF jumps, then LSFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDIBF
1D Price
Change %
MDIBF100%
+16.18%
LSFG - MDIBF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNKHF - MDIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JPHLF - MDIBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBK - MDIBF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
SVKEF - MDIBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More