Advertisement
LXEH vs ROMA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LXEH is a Buy and ROMA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LXEH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileROMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LXEH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ROMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LXEH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROMA’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LXEH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ROMA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LXEH (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а -5.85% price change this week, while ROMA (@Data Processing Services) price change was -5.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.46%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.25%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Specialties (-0.10% weekly)‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.
@Data Processing Services (+0.06% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| LXEH | ROMA | LXEH / ROMA | |
| Capitalization | 6.07M | 149M | 4% |
| EBITDA | -99.06M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -93.693 | 233.333 | -40% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 40.9M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| LXEH | ROMA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 87% | 22 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | N/A |
Advertisement
LXEH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LXEH has been loosely correlated with SRRPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LXEH jumps, then SRRPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LXEH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LXEH | 100% | -7.70% | ||
| SRRPF - LXEH | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GLAI - LXEH | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| INTJ - LXEH | 33% Loosely correlated | +5.91% | ||
| GPN - LXEH | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.23% | ||
| SST - LXEH | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.50% | ||
More | ||||
ROMA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ROMA and AFYA have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ROMA and AFYA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROMA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROMA | 100% | -5.45% | ||
| AFYA - ROMA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| EDTK - ROMA | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
| TAL - ROMA | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
| RELX - ROMA | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LXEH - ROMA | 10% Poorly correlated | -7.70% | ||
More | ||||