LWSCF
Price
$13.58
Change
-$0.03 (-0.22%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
631.7M
RAFLF
Price
$0.75
Change
+$0.15 (+25.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LWSCF vs RAFLF

Header iconLWSCF vs RAFLF Comparison
Open Charts LWSCF vs RAFLFBanner chart's image
Sienna Sr Living
Price$13.58
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
Volume$600
Capitalization631.7M
Raffles Medical Group
Price$0.75
Change+$0.15 (+25.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.93B
LWSCF vs RAFLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWSCF vs. RAFLF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWSCF is a Hold and RAFLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (LWSCF: $13.58 vs. RAFLF: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: LWSCF and RAFLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWSCF: 3% vs. RAFLF: 4%
Market capitalization -- LWSCF: $631.7M vs. RAFLF: $1.93B
LWSCF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $631.7M. RAFLF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $1.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWSCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRAFLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LWSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RAFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LWSCF is a better buy in the long-term than RAFLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LWSCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAFLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LWSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RAFLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RAFLF is a better buy in the short-term than LWSCF.

Price Growth

LWSCF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while RAFLF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.14% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAFLF($1.93B) has a higher market cap than LWSCF($632M). LWSCF has higher P/E ratio than RAFLF: LWSCF (76.92) vs RAFLF (17.54). LWSCF YTD gains are higher at: 24.874 vs. RAFLF (12.427). RAFLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 239M vs. LWSCF (63.9M). RAFLF has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. LWSCF (30.4M). RAFLF has less debt than LWSCF: RAFLF (96.1M) vs LWSCF (999M). RAFLF (767M) and LWSCF (736M) have equivalent revenues.
LWSCFRAFLFLWSCF / RAFLF
Capitalization632M1.93B33%
EBITDA63.9M239M27%
Gain YTD24.87412.427200%
P/E Ratio76.9217.54438%
Revenue736M767M96%
Total Cash30.4M253M12%
Total Debt999M96.1M1,040%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWSCF vs RAFLF: Fundamental Ratings
LWSCF
RAFLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4681
SMR RATING
1..100
9079
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3318
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LWSCF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is in the same range as RAFLF (38). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to RAFLF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAFLF (81). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAFLF’s over the last 12 months.

RAFLF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (90). This means that RAFLF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

RAFLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (46). This means that RAFLF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

RAFLF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (33). This means that RAFLF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWSCFRAFLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCVCX31.640.12
+0.38%
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq C
TWADX8.10-0.01
-0.12%
American Century Value A
NMULX11.11-0.03
-0.27%
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opp I
FIGRX56.75-0.24
-0.42%
Fidelity International Discovery
IOVVX33.15-0.14
-0.42%
Invesco Comstock Select R5

LWSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWSCF and MFCSF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWSCF and MFCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWSCF
1D Price
Change %
LWSCF100%
-0.26%
MFCSF - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
HLYK - LWSCF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWKHY - LWSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - LWSCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - LWSCF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RAFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RAFLF and HLYK have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAFLF and HLYK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RAFLF
1D Price
Change %
RAFLF100%
N/A
HLYK - RAFLF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - RAFLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.68%
KJFI - RAFLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-37.18%
ORPEF - RAFLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWKHY - RAFLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More