LWSCF
Price
$13.25
Change
+$0.31 (+2.40%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
NWKHY
Price
$7.17
Change
-$0.63 (-8.08%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
957.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LWSCF vs NWKHY

Header iconLWSCF vs NWKHY Comparison
Open Charts LWSCF vs NWKHYBanner chart's image
Sienna Sr Living
Price$13.25
Change+$0.31 (+2.40%)
Volume$850
Capitalization1.25B
Netcare
Price$7.17
Change-$0.63 (-8.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization957.55M
LWSCF vs NWKHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWKHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWSCF vs. NWKHY commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWSCF is a Hold and NWKHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (LWSCF: $13.25 vs. NWKHY: $7.17)
Brand notoriety: LWSCF and NWKHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWSCF: 3% vs. NWKHY: 100%
Market capitalization -- LWSCF: $1.25B vs. NWKHY: $957.55M
LWSCF [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.25B. NWKHY’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $957.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $89.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $3.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWSCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWKHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LWSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWKHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LWSCF is a better buy in the long-term than NWKHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LWSCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWKHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LWSCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NWKHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWKHY is a better buy in the short-term than LWSCF.

Price Growth

LWSCF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +2.40% price change this week, while NWKHY (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -5.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+5.03% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LWSCF($1.25B) has a higher market cap than NWKHY($958M). LWSCF has higher P/E ratio than NWKHY: LWSCF (44.41) vs NWKHY (10.69). LWSCF YTD gains are higher at: 21.839 vs. NWKHY (-2.973).
LWSCFNWKHYLWSCF / NWKHY
Capitalization1.25B958M130%
EBITDA135MN/A-
Gain YTD21.839-2.973-735%
P/E Ratio44.4110.69415%
Revenue896MN/A-
Total Cash137MN/A-
Total Debt979MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWSCF vs NWKHY: Fundamental Ratings
LWSCF
NWKHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
8899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4181
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWKHY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (19). This means that NWKHY’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWKHY (100). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWKHY’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as NWKHY (99). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to NWKHY’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as NWKHY (59). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to NWKHY’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NWKHY (81). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NWKHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWSCFNWKHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
12%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWKHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWRLX12.230.13
+1.07%
Fidelity Select Wireless
ARFFX17.720.13
+0.74%
Ariel Focus Investor
VSPGX941.276.96
+0.74%
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Instl
SGTTX84.910.57
+0.68%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst2
IYIGX38.400.20
+0.52%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class R

LWSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWSCF and MFCSF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWSCF and MFCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWSCF
1D Price
Change %
LWSCF100%
N/A
MFCSF - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
HLYK - LWSCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
NWKHY - LWSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - LWSCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - LWSCF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWKHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWKHY and CCEL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWKHY and CCEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWKHY
1D Price
Change %
NWKHY100%
N/A
CCEL - NWKHY
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
RKAGY - NWKHY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRSS - NWKHY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - NWKHY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
RAFLF - NWKHY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More