LWSCF
Price
$15.52
Change
+$0.25 (+1.64%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.44B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MFCSF
Price
$11.49
Change
-$0.06 (-0.52%)
Updated
Jan 12 closing price
Capitalization
204.87M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LWSCF vs MFCSF

Header iconLWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison
Open Charts LWSCF vs MFCSFBanner chart's image
Sienna Sr Living
Price$15.52
Change+$0.25 (+1.64%)
Volume$116
Capitalization1.44B
Medical Facilities
Price$11.49
Change-$0.06 (-0.52%)
Volume$4.4K
Capitalization204.87M
LWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison Chart in %
LWSCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWSCF vs. MFCSF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWSCF is a Hold and MFCSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (LWSCF: $15.52 vs. MFCSF: $11.49)
Brand notoriety: LWSCF and MFCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWSCF: 1% vs. MFCSF: 25%
Market capitalization -- LWSCF: $1.44B vs. MFCSF: $204.87M
LWSCF [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.44B. MFCSF’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $204.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $109.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWSCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCSF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LWSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LWSCF and MFCSF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LWSCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LWSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LWSCF is a better buy in the short-term than MFCSF.

Price Growth

LWSCF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while MFCSF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.42% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LWSCF($1.44B) has a higher market cap than MFCSF($205M). LWSCF has higher P/E ratio than MFCSF: LWSCF (48.99) vs MFCSF (5.89). LWSCF YTD gains are higher at: 3.743 vs. MFCSF (1.188). LWSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. MFCSF (75.9M). LWSCF has more cash in the bank: 105M vs. MFCSF (46.8M). MFCSF has less debt than LWSCF: MFCSF (65.1M) vs LWSCF (1.33B). LWSCF has higher revenues than MFCSF: LWSCF (967M) vs MFCSF (336M).
LWSCFMFCSFLWSCF / MFCSF
Capitalization1.44B205M703%
EBITDA149M75.9M196%
Gain YTD3.7431.188315%
P/E Ratio48.995.89831%
Revenue967M336M288%
Total Cash105M46.8M224%
Total Debt1.33B65.1M2,048%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWSCF vs MFCSF: Fundamental Ratings
LWSCF
MFCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9494
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5834
SMR RATING
1..100
8713
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1897
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5012

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LWSCF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (6). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (58). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWSCF (87). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (51). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFCSF (97). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWSCFMFCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LWSCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MFCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGLIX16.400.07
+0.43%
MFS Global Real Estate I
GCSVX9.560.04
+0.42%
Geneva SMID Cap Growth Institutional
MAICX10.140.04
+0.40%
Victory Trivalent Intl Fd-Core Eq A
FDGKX44.03N/A
N/A
Fidelity Dividend Growth K
CEKRX17.63-0.05
-0.28%
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst2

LWSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWSCF and ASTH have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWSCF and ASTH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWSCF
1D Price
Change %
LWSCF100%
N/A
ASTH - LWSCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
MFCSF - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
NWKHY - LWSCF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - LWSCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
N/A
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - MFCSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWKHY - MFCSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More