LWSCF
Price
$12.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.19B
MFCSF
Price
$10.63
Change
+$0.19 (+1.82%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
199.76M
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LWSCF vs MFCSF

Header iconLWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison
Open Charts LWSCF vs MFCSFBanner chart's image
Sienna Sr Living
Price$12.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$134
Capitalization1.19B
Medical Facilities
Price$10.63
Change+$0.19 (+1.82%)
Volume$310
Capitalization199.76M
LWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWSCF vs. MFCSF commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWSCF is a Hold and MFCSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (LWSCF: $12.90 vs. MFCSF: $10.63)
Brand notoriety: LWSCF and MFCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWSCF: 1% vs. MFCSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- LWSCF: $1.19B vs. MFCSF: $199.76M
LWSCF [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.19B. MFCSF’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $199.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWSCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LWSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the long-term than LWSCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LWSCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LWSCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the short-term than LWSCF.

Price Growth

LWSCF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while MFCSF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.56% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LWSCF($1.19B) has a higher market cap than MFCSF($200M). LWSCF has higher P/E ratio than MFCSF: LWSCF (45.59) vs MFCSF (5.72). LWSCF YTD gains are higher at: 18.621 vs. MFCSF (-1.181). LWSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 136M vs. MFCSF (81.5M). MFCSF has more cash in the bank: 49M vs. LWSCF (23.2M). MFCSF has less debt than LWSCF: MFCSF (67.6M) vs LWSCF (1.18B). LWSCF has higher revenues than MFCSF: LWSCF (930M) vs MFCSF (330M).
LWSCFMFCSFLWSCF / MFCSF
Capitalization1.19B200M595%
EBITDA136M81.5M167%
Gain YTD18.621-1.181-1,576%
P/E Ratio45.595.72798%
Revenue930M330M282%
Total Cash23.2M49M47%
Total Debt1.18B67.6M1,750%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWSCF vs MFCSF: Fundamental Ratings
LWSCF
MFCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5122
SMR RATING
1..100
8813
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5462
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LWSCF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (13). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (51). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWSCF (88). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (62). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFCSF (98). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew significantly faster than MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWSCFMFCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IGNIX18.740.09
+0.48%
Macquarie Natural Resources I
DGOYX45.92N/A
N/A
Davis Opportunity Y
HFQTX6.99-0.03
-0.43%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income T
FAPLX13.21-0.07
-0.53%
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future M
CVGCX15.42-0.18
-1.15%
Calamos Growth C

LWSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWSCF and MFCSF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWSCF and MFCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWSCF
1D Price
Change %
LWSCF100%
-0.02%
MFCSF - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
HLYK - LWSCF
9%
Poorly correlated
+7.51%
NWKHY - LWSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - LWSCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - LWSCF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
+1.83%
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
HLYK - MFCSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.51%
ORPEF - MFCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - MFCSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More