LWSCF
Price
$13.25
Change
+$0.31 (+2.40%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.25B
MFCSF
Price
$10.35
Change
-$0.07 (-0.67%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
202.69M
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LWSCF vs MFCSF

Header iconLWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison
Open Charts LWSCF vs MFCSFBanner chart's image
Sienna Sr Living
Price$13.25
Change+$0.31 (+2.40%)
Volume$850
Capitalization1.25B
Medical Facilities
Price$10.35
Change-$0.07 (-0.67%)
Volume$5.24K
Capitalization202.69M
LWSCF vs MFCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWSCF vs. MFCSF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWSCF is a Hold and MFCSF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (LWSCF: $13.25 vs. MFCSF: $10.35)
Brand notoriety: LWSCF and MFCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWSCF: 3% vs. MFCSF: 212%
Market capitalization -- LWSCF: $1.25B vs. MFCSF: $202.69M
LWSCF [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $1.25B. MFCSF’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $202.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $89.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $3.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWSCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LWSCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LWSCF is a better buy in the long-term than MFCSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LWSCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LWSCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LWSCF is a better buy in the short-term than MFCSF.

Price Growth

LWSCF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +2.40% price change this week, while MFCSF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -1.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+5.03% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LWSCF($1.25B) has a higher market cap than MFCSF($203M). LWSCF has higher P/E ratio than MFCSF: LWSCF (44.41) vs MFCSF (5.56). LWSCF YTD gains are higher at: 21.839 vs. MFCSF (-3.806). LWSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 135M vs. MFCSF (82.7M). LWSCF has more cash in the bank: 137M vs. MFCSF (65.7M). MFCSF has less debt than LWSCF: MFCSF (71.1M) vs LWSCF (979M). LWSCF has higher revenues than MFCSF: LWSCF (896M) vs MFCSF (331M).
LWSCFMFCSFLWSCF / MFCSF
Capitalization1.25B203M616%
EBITDA135M82.7M163%
Gain YTD21.839-3.806-574%
P/E Ratio44.415.56798%
Revenue896M331M271%
Total Cash137M65.7M209%
Total Debt979M71.1M1,377%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWSCF vs MFCSF: Fundamental Ratings
LWSCF
MFCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4424
SMR RATING
1..100
8814
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5063
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFCSF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (19). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as LWSCF (44). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWSCF (88). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LWSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (63). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

LWSCF's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFCSF (98). This means that LWSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWSCFMFCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LWSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWRLX12.230.13
+1.07%
Fidelity Select Wireless
ARFFX17.720.13
+0.74%
Ariel Focus Investor
VSPGX941.276.96
+0.74%
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Instl
SGTTX84.910.57
+0.68%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst2
IYIGX38.400.20
+0.52%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class R

LWSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWSCF and MFCSF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWSCF and MFCSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWSCF
1D Price
Change %
LWSCF100%
N/A
MFCSF - LWSCF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
HLYK - LWSCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
NWKHY - LWSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - LWSCF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - LWSCF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
-0.67%
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLYK - MFCSF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
ORPEF - MFCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - MFCSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More