LWCL
Price
$38.10
Change
+$5.85 (+18.14%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MPB
Price
$26.25
Change
-$0.58 (-2.16%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
331.64M
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LWCL vs MPB

Header iconLWCL vs MPB Comparison
Open Charts LWCL vs MPBBanner chart's image
Lewis & Clark BAN
Price$38.10
Change+$5.85 (+18.14%)
Volume$684
CapitalizationN/A
Mid Penn Ban
Price$26.25
Change-$0.58 (-2.16%)
Volume$68.4K
Capitalization331.64M
LWCL vs MPB Comparison Chart
Loading...
MPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LWCL vs. MPB commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LWCL is a Hold and MPB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LWCL: $38.10 vs. MPB: $26.25)
Brand notoriety: LWCL and MPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LWCL: 46% vs. MPB: 67%
Market capitalization -- LWCL: $0 vs. MPB: $331.64M
LWCL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MPB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $331.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LWCL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMPB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LWCL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPB is a better buy in the long-term than LWCL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MPB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MPB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

LWCL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +18.14% price change this week, while MPB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

MPB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LWCL YTD gains are higher at: 26.789 vs. MPB (-7.736).
LWCLMPBLWCL / MPB
CapitalizationN/A332M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.789-7.736-346%
P/E RatioN/A8.80-
RevenueN/A168M-
Total CashN/A52.5M-
Total DebtN/A254M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LWCL vs MPB: Fundamental Ratings
LWCL
MPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
10023
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPB's Valuation (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LWCL (81) in the null industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LWCL’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LWCL (100) in the null industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LWCL’s over the last 12 months.

MPB's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for LWCL (100) in the null industry. This means that MPB’s stock grew significantly faster than LWCL’s over the last 12 months.

LWCL's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MPB (57) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LWCL’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

LWCL's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as MPB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LWCL’s stock grew similarly to MPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MPB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MPB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBIH25.99-0.03
-0.12%
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF
FXY64.02-0.13
-0.20%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen
EDF5.01-0.03
-0.60%
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund
ARGT86.39-1.34
-1.53%
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF
SPSM41.47-0.83
-1.96%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 600™ Sm Cap ETF

LWCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LWCL and CCBC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWCL and CCBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LWCL
1D Price
Change %
LWCL100%
N/A
CCBC - LWCL
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
TRCY - LWCL
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPB - LWCL
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
BHLB - LWCL
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
NBN - LWCL
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
More