It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LWAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAVS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LWAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LWAY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -10.44% price change this week, while PAVS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.13%.
LWAY is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.
PAVS is expected to report earnings on Aug 16, 2022.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
LWAY | PAVS | LWAY / PAVS | |
Capitalization | 277M | 13.5M | 2,052% |
EBITDA | 20.2M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 74.422 | -63.008 | -118% |
P/E Ratio | 25.17 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 160M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 13.2M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 2.93M | N/A | - |
LWAY | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LWAY | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LWAY and DAR have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LWAY and DAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LWAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LWAY | 100% | -3.15% | ||
DAR - LWAY | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.55% | ||
BRCNF - LWAY | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NATR - LWAY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.83% | ||
BRID - LWAY | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.05% | ||
FRPT - LWAY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAVS has been loosely correlated with CHFLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAVS jumps, then CHFLF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAVS | 100% | +2.81% | ||
CHFLF - PAVS | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
PIFMY - PAVS | 25% Poorly correlated | -6.63% | ||
CFEIY - PAVS | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GPDNF - PAVS | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
LWAY - PAVS | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.15% | ||
More |