LW vs POST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a Hold and POST is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- POST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- POST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +8.60% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.
POST is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.58% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| LW | POST | LW / POST | |
| Capitalization | 15.4B | 6.45B | 239% |
| EBITDA | 1.34B | 1.13B | 119% |
| Gain YTD | -22.408 | 31.308 | -72% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.62 | 22.68 | 60% |
| Revenue | 6.35B | 7.39B | 86% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 151M | - |
| Total Debt | 3.63B | 6.32B | 57% |
LW | POST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LW's Valuation (48) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (85). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.
POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (88). This means that POST’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's SMR Rating (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (78). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.
POST's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (47). This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.
LW's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (72). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.
| LW | POST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 53% |
LW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and POST have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and POST's prices will move in lockstep.
POST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POST has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POST jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To POST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| POST | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| KHC - POST | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| GIS - POST | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| HSY - POST | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| CAG - POST | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| INGR - POST | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
More | ||||