LW
Price
$53.40
Change
+$0.21 (+0.39%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
15.38B
31 days until earnings call
POST
Price
$108.73
Change
+$0.33 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.45B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LW vs POST

Header iconLW vs POST Comparison
Open Charts LW vs POSTBanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$53.40
Change+$0.21 (+0.39%)
Volume$3.56M
Capitalization15.38B
Post Holdings
Price$108.73
Change+$0.33 (+0.30%)
Volume$903.67K
Capitalization6.45B
LW vs POST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. POST commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a Buy and POST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LW: $53.40 vs. POST: $108.73)
Brand notoriety: LW and POST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 220% vs. POST: 153%
Market capitalization -- LW: $15.38B vs. POST: $6.45B
LW [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $15.38B. POST’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $6.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePOST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • POST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the long-term than POST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while POST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • POST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LW is a better buy in the short-term than POST.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.24% price change this week, while POST (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

POST is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($15.4B) has a higher market cap than POST($6.45B). POST has higher P/E ratio than LW: POST (22.68) vs LW (13.62). POST YTD gains are higher at: -5.006 vs. LW (-19.038). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.34B vs. POST (1.13B). LW has less debt than POST: LW (3.63B) vs POST (6.32B). POST has higher revenues than LW: POST (7.39B) vs LW (6.35B).
LWPOSTLW / POST
Capitalization15.4B6.45B239%
EBITDA1.34B1.13B119%
Gain YTD-19.038-5.006380%
P/E Ratio13.6222.6860%
Revenue6.35B7.39B86%
Total CashN/A151M-
Total Debt3.63B6.32B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs POST: Fundamental Ratings
LW
POST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1812
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
4272
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (36) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (84). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100). This means that POST’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as POST (72). This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to POST’s over the last 12 months.

POST's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as LW (63). This means that POST’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for POST (58). This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than POST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWPOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
POST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GJH9.310.17
+1.86%
Synthetic Fixed-Income Sec STRATS 2004-06
SMCO25.600.07
+0.29%
Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF
FDV27.450.05
+0.18%
Federated Hermes US Strategic Dvd ETF
FTGC24.66-0.12
-0.48%
First Trust Global Tact Cmdty Strat ETF
EPV26.13-0.93
-3.44%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LW and POST have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LW and POST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+0.39%
POST - LW
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
KHC - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
THS - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
INGR - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
SMPL - LW
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
More

POST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, POST has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if POST jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To POST
1D Price
Change %
POST100%
+0.30%
KHC - POST
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.70%
MDLZ - POST
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
MKC - POST
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.62%
GIS - POST
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
CPB - POST
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
More