LW
Price
$47.20
Change
+$0.90 (+1.94%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.43B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAMA
Price
$15.45
Change
+$0.07 (+0.46%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
625.65M
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LW vs MAMA

Header iconLW vs MAMA Comparison
Open Charts LW vs MAMABanner chart's image
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$47.20
Change+$0.90 (+1.94%)
Volume$3.17K
Capitalization6.43B
Mama's Creations
Price$15.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.46%)
Volume$100
Capitalization625.65M
LW vs MAMA Comparison Chart in %
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LW vs. MAMA commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LW is a StrongBuy and MAMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (LW: $46.29 vs. MAMA: $15.38)
Brand notoriety: LW and MAMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LW: 96% vs. MAMA: 59%
Market capitalization -- LW: $6.43B vs. MAMA: $625.65M
LW [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $6.43B. MAMA’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $625.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $251.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than LW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LW and MAMA are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LW (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +3.61% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +3.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +239.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

LW is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2026.

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.57% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LW($6.43B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($626M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than LW: MAMA (128.25) vs LW (16.77). MAMA YTD gains are higher at: 14.010 vs. LW (11.425). LW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.12B vs. MAMA (9.98M). MAMA has less debt than LW: MAMA (16M) vs LW (3.95B). LW has higher revenues than MAMA: LW (6.47B) vs MAMA (151M).
LWMAMALW / MAMA
Capitalization6.43B626M1,027%
EBITDA1.12B9.98M11,198%
Gain YTD11.42514.01082%
P/E Ratio16.77128.2513%
Revenue6.47B151M4,287%
Total CashN/A18.1M-
Total Debt3.95B16M24,656%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW vs MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
LW
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1875
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10011
SMR RATING
1..100
4060
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6337
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LW's Valuation (26) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (91) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew significantly faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

LW's SMR Rating (40) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MAMA (60) in the null industry. This means that LW’s stock grew similarly to MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as LW (63) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LW’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LW (80) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MAMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LWMAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAMA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BADEX11.480.09
+0.79%
BlackRock Defensive Advantage EM Inv A
IDHCX20.790.06
+0.29%
Integrity Dividend Harvest C
CSCCX22.51-0.07
-0.31%
Calvert Small-Cap C
SHISX65.26-0.51
-0.78%
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Svc
TVRIX18.11-0.15
-0.82%
NAA Allocation Institutional

LW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LW
1D Price
Change %
LW100%
+2.82%
CAG - LW
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.97%
FLO - LW
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
KHC - LW
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
CPB - LW
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.29%
GIS - LW
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and JBSS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and JBSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
-0.32%
JBSS - MAMA
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
USNA - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
NOMD - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
LW - MAMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
More