LVXFF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
21.51M
SNWGF
Price
$6.90
Change
-$0.23 (-3.23%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.11B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVXFF vs SNWGF

Header iconLVXFF vs SNWGF Comparison
Open Charts LVXFF vs SNWGFBanner chart's image
Leviathan Gold
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28.35K
Capitalization21.51M
SNOWLINE GOLD
Price$6.90
Change-$0.23 (-3.23%)
Volume$145.72K
Capitalization1.11B
LVXFF vs SNWGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVXFF vs. SNWGF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVXFF is a Hold and SNWGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (LVXFF: $0.26 vs. SNWGF: $6.90)
Brand notoriety: LVXFF and SNWGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVXFF: 88% vs. SNWGF: 111%
Market capitalization -- LVXFF: $21.51M vs. SNWGF: $1.11B
LVXFF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $21.51M. SNWGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVXFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNWGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LVXFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNWGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LVXFF is a better buy in the long-term than SNWGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVXFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNWGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVXFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SNWGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVXFF is a better buy in the short-term than SNWGF.

Price Growth

LVXFF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SNWGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNWGF($1.11B) has a higher market cap than LVXFF($21.5M). LVXFF YTD gains are higher at: 782.550 vs. SNWGF (92.670). LVXFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.65M vs. SNWGF (-29.63M). SNWGF has more cash in the bank: 42M vs. LVXFF (1.6M). LVXFF (0) and SNWGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LVXFFSNWGFLVXFF / SNWGF
Capitalization21.5M1.11B2%
EBITDA-1.65M-29.63M6%
Gain YTD782.55092.670844%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.6M42M4%
Total DebtN/A42.5K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVXFFSNWGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVXFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORLCF0.02N/A
+18.99%
ORACLE COMMODITY HLDG CORP
AUOTY4.280.02
+0.38%
AUO CORPORATION
CHJTF1.27N/A
N/A
CSPC Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd.
TLOFF0.29N/A
-1.44%
Talon Metals Corp.
MMTIF0.05N/A
-2.40%
Micromem Technologies, Inc.

LVXFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVXFF and ECRFF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVXFF and ECRFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVXFF
1D Price
Change %
LVXFF100%
N/A
ECRFF - LVXFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
AAUGF - LVXFF
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
MAUTF - LVXFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.43%
CRDOF - LVXFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
SNWGF - LVXFF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-3.23%

SNWGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNWGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNWGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNWGF
1D Price
Change %
SNWGF100%
-3.23%
TORXF - SNWGF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
LUGDF - SNWGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.43%
ORZCF - SNWGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
KNTNF - SNWGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
PROBF - SNWGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
More