Advertisement
LVS vs NBCC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVS is a Hold and NBCC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LVS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- LVS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LVS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LVS (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.29% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-0.04% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
LVS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LVS | NBCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GHYG | 46.08 | 0.08 | +0.17% |
| iShares US & Intl High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
| AOK | 38.85 | 0.03 | +0.08% |
| iShares Core 30/70 Cnsrv Allc ETF | |||
| SCDL | 33.89 | N/A | N/A |
| ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Div Fctr TR ETN | |||
| ONEZ | 25.50 | N/A | -0.01% |
| TrueShares Seasonality Laddered Buf ETF | |||
| XLG | 53.12 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | |||
LVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | -0.53% | ||
| WYNN - LVS | 76% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 71% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| VAC - LVS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| BYD - LVS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
NBCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NBCC has been loosely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NBCC jumps, then HD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NBCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NBCC | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| HD - NBCC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| WIX - NBCC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| ZTS - NBCC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| DKNG - NBCC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| LVS - NBCC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||