LVS
Price
$58.96
Change
-$1.65 (-2.72%)
Updated
Jan 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.98B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGM
Price
$34.98
Change
-$0.43 (-1.21%)
Updated
Jan 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.68B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVS vs MGM

Header iconLVS vs MGM Comparison
Open Charts LVS vs MGMBanner chart's image
Las Vegas Sands
Price$58.96
Change-$1.65 (-2.72%)
Volume$64.84K
Capitalization40.98B
MGM Resorts International
Price$34.98
Change-$0.43 (-1.21%)
Volume$74.05K
Capitalization9.68B
LVS vs MGM Comparison Chart in %
LVS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVS vs. MGM commentary
Jan 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVS is a Hold and MGM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 17, 2026
Stock price -- (LVS: $60.61 vs. MGM: $35.41)
Brand notoriety: LVS and MGM are both notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVS: 128% vs. MGM: 100%
Market capitalization -- LVS: $40.98B vs. MGM: $9.68B
LVS [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $40.98B. MGM’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $9.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $40.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LVS is a better buy in the long-term than MGM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGM is a better buy in the short-term than LVS.

Price Growth

LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -2.08% price change this week, while MGM (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

LVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.

MGM is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.62% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVS($41B) has a higher market cap than MGM($9.69B). MGM has higher P/E ratio than LVS: MGM (177.05) vs LVS (27.30). MGM YTD gains are higher at: -2.960 vs. LVS (-6.883). LVS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.38B vs. MGM (1.76B). LVS has more cash in the bank: 3.35B vs. MGM (2.13B). LVS has less debt than MGM: LVS (15.8B) vs MGM (31.2B). MGM has higher revenues than LVS: MGM (17.3B) vs LVS (12.3B).
LVSMGMLVS / MGM
Capitalization41B9.69B423%
EBITDA4.38B1.76B249%
Gain YTD-6.883-2.960233%
P/E Ratio27.30177.0515%
Revenue12.3B17.3B71%
Total Cash3.35B2.13B157%
Total Debt15.8B31.2B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVS vs MGM: Fundamental Ratings
LVS
MGM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5956
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8686
SMR RATING
1..100
1788
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
271
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGM's Valuation (83) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (85). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (86). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.

LVS's SMR Rating (17) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGM (88). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than MGM’s over the last 12 months.

LVS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MGM (59). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.

MGM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as LVS (27). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to LVS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVSMGM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPRO120.540.87
+0.73%
ProShares UltraPro S&P500
ABCS31.560.18
+0.59%
Alpha Blue Capital US Sm-Md Cp Dyn ETF
OPER100.170.01
+0.01%
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF
NMAI13.22-0.04
-0.33%
Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund
PLOO16.73-0.15
-0.92%
Leverage Shares 2x Cpd Acclrtd PLTRMnETF

LVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVS
1D Price
Change %
LVS100%
+1.19%
WYNN - LVS
74%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
MLCO - LVS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
MGM - LVS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
SCHYY - LVS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
BYD - LVS
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
More

MGM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGM
1D Price
Change %
MGM100%
+2.91%
CZR - MGM
73%
Closely correlated
+3.60%
BYD - MGM
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.39%
WYNN - MGM
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
RRR - MGM
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
LVS - MGM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
More