LVMUY
Price
$116.58
Change
-$5.12 (-4.21%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
289.13B
33 days until earnings call
PNDZF
Price
$138.50
Change
-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVMUY vs PNDZF

Header iconLVMUY vs PNDZF Comparison
Open Charts LVMUY vs PNDZFBanner chart's image
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$116.58
Change-$5.12 (-4.21%)
Volume$443.66K
Capitalization289.13B
Pandora A/S
Price$138.50
Change-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Volume$311
Capitalization10.24B
LVMUY vs PNDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVMUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVMUY vs. PNDZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVMUY is a Hold and PNDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LVMUY: $116.58 vs. PNDZF: $138.50)
Brand notoriety: LVMUY and PNDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVMUY: 114% vs. PNDZF: 228%
Market capitalization -- LVMUY: $289.13B vs. PNDZF: $10.24B
LVMUY [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $289.13B. PNDZF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $10.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $289.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $39.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVMUY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNDZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LVMUY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNDZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNDZF is a better buy in the long-term than LVMUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVMUY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNDZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVMUY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PNDZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVMUY is a better buy in the short-term than PNDZF.

Price Growth

LVMUY (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -3.05% price change this week, while PNDZF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

LVMUY is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+1.14% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMUY($289B) has a higher market cap than PNDZF($10.2B). LVMUY has higher P/E ratio than PNDZF: LVMUY (22.64) vs PNDZF (13.12). LVMUY YTD gains are higher at: -8.055 vs. PNDZF (-22.007). LVMUY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.5B vs. PNDZF (10.3B). LVMUY has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. PNDZF (817M). PNDZF has less debt than LVMUY: PNDZF (16.1B) vs LVMUY (39.6B). LVMUY has higher revenues than PNDZF: LVMUY (82.8B) vs PNDZF (32.5B).
LVMUYPNDZFLVMUY / PNDZF
Capitalization289B10.2B2,833%
EBITDA25.5B10.3B248%
Gain YTD-8.055-22.00737%
P/E Ratio22.6413.12173%
Revenue82.8B32.5B255%
Total Cash12.3B817M1,506%
Total Debt39.6B16.1B246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVMUY vs PNDZF: Fundamental Ratings
LVMUY
PNDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2396
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6853
SMR RATING
1..100
9912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5185
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4786
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNDZF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMUY (76). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LVMUY’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMUY (68). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LVMUY’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LVMUY (99). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew significantly faster than LVMUY’s over the last 12 months.

LVMUY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (85). This means that LVMUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMUY's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (86). This means that LVMUY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVMUYPNDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVMUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IUSV98.970.75
+0.76%
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF
EWUS39.770.29
+0.72%
iShares MSCI United Kingdom Small-Cp ETF
CCNR28.830.04
+0.15%
ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
DIVZ35.780.04
+0.11%
Opal Dividend Income ETF
ACP5.89N/A
N/A
abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund

LVMUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMUY has been closely correlated with LVMHF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMUY jumps, then LVMHF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMUY
1D Price
Change %
LVMUY100%
-4.21%
LVMHF - LVMUY
97%
Closely correlated
-3.97%
HESAY - LVMUY
83%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
HESAF - LVMUY
74%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
PPRUY - LVMUY
68%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
SWGAY - LVMUY
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More

PNDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNDZF and MENEF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNDZF and MENEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNDZF
1D Price
Change %
PNDZF100%
N/A
MENEF - PNDZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.92%
HESAF - PNDZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
LVMUY - PNDZF
0%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
MNNGF - PNDZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMHF - PNDZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
More