LVMHF
Price
$583.85
Change
-$24.15 (-3.97%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
289.13B
PNDZF
Price
$138.50
Change
-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
10.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVMHF vs PNDZF

Header iconLVMHF vs PNDZF Comparison
Open Charts LVMHF vs PNDZFBanner chart's image
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$583.85
Change-$24.15 (-3.97%)
Volume$2.44K
Capitalization289.13B
Pandora A/S
Price$138.50
Change-$30.60 (-18.10%)
Volume$311
Capitalization10.24B
LVMHF vs PNDZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVMHF vs. PNDZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVMHF is a Hold and PNDZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LVMHF: $583.85 vs. PNDZF: $138.50)
Brand notoriety: LVMHF and PNDZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVMHF: 48% vs. PNDZF: 228%
Market capitalization -- LVMHF: $289.13B vs. PNDZF: $10.24B
LVMHF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $289.13B. PNDZF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $10.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $289.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $39.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVMHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePNDZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PNDZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNDZF is a better buy in the long-term than LVMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVMHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNDZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVMHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNDZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVMHF is a better buy in the short-term than PNDZF.

Price Growth

LVMHF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -2.93% price change this week, while PNDZF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+1.14% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMHF($289B) has a higher market cap than PNDZF($10.2B). LVMHF has higher P/E ratio than PNDZF: LVMHF (22.69) vs PNDZF (13.12). LVMHF YTD gains are higher at: -11.093 vs. PNDZF (-22.007). LVMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.5B vs. PNDZF (10.3B). LVMHF has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. PNDZF (817M). PNDZF has less debt than LVMHF: PNDZF (16.1B) vs LVMHF (39.6B). LVMHF has higher revenues than PNDZF: LVMHF (82.8B) vs PNDZF (32.5B).
LVMHFPNDZFLVMHF / PNDZF
Capitalization289B10.2B2,833%
EBITDA25.5B10.3B248%
Gain YTD-11.093-22.00750%
P/E Ratio22.6913.12173%
Revenue82.8B32.5B255%
Total Cash12.3B817M1,506%
Total Debt39.6B16.1B246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVMHF vs PNDZF: Fundamental Ratings
LVMHF
PNDZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2896
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7853
SMR RATING
1..100
9912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5285
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4786
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNDZF's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (77). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (78). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

PNDZF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LVMHF (99). This means that PNDZF’s stock grew significantly faster than LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMHF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (85). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMHF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNDZF (86). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNDZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVMHFPNDZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNDZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FINW19.450.61
+3.24%
FinWise Bancorp
BBVA18.460.47
+2.61%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
VFC14.970.15
+1.01%
VF Corp
PCRX26.73-0.45
-1.66%
Pacira BioSciences
RAIN4.55-0.42
-8.45%
RAIN ENHANCEMENT TECHNOLOGIES HOLDCO INC

LVMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMHF
1D Price
Change %
LVMHF100%
-3.97%
LVMUY - LVMHF
97%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
HESAY - LVMHF
81%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
HESAF - LVMHF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
PPRUY - LVMHF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
SWGAY - LVMHF
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
More

PNDZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNDZF and MENEF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNDZF and MENEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNDZF
1D Price
Change %
PNDZF100%
N/A
MENEF - PNDZF
4%
Poorly correlated
-10.92%
HESAF - PNDZF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.79%
LVMUY - PNDZF
0%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
MNNGF - PNDZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVMHF - PNDZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.97%
More