LVMHF
Price
$598.00
Change
-$12.43 (-2.04%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
306.67B
MNNGF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
52.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVMHF vs MNNGF

Header iconLVMHF vs MNNGF Comparison
Open Charts LVMHF vs MNNGFBanner chart's image
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
Price$598.00
Change-$12.43 (-2.04%)
Volume$1.21K
Capitalization306.67B
Affluent Partners Holdings
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$917
Capitalization52.69M
LVMHF vs MNNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVMHF vs. MNNGF commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVMHF is a Hold and MNNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (LVMHF: $598.00 vs. MNNGF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: LVMHF and MNNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVMHF: 32% vs. MNNGF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LVMHF: $306.67B vs. MNNGF: $52.69M
LVMHF [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $306.67B. MNNGF’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $52.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $306.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $41.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVMHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LVMHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LVMHF and MNNGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVMHF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LVMHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LVMHF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -1.81% price change this week, while MNNGF (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+0.30% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVMHF($307B) has a higher market cap than MNNGF($52.7M). MNNGF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. LVMHF (-8.939).
LVMHFMNNGFLVMHF / MNNGF
Capitalization307B52.7M582,543%
EBITDA25.5BN/A-
Gain YTD-8.93960.000-15%
P/E Ratio23.03N/A-
Revenue82.8BN/A-
Total Cash12.3BN/A-
Total Debt39.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVMHF vs MNNGF: Fundamental Ratings
LVMHF
MNNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1034
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7756
SMR RATING
1..100
9998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
42100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LVMHF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MNNGF (87). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew similarly to MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (77). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (99). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

MNNGF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LVMHF (52). This means that MNNGF’s stock grew similarly to LVMHF’s over the last 12 months.

LVMHF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNNGF (100). This means that LVMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVMHFMNNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIOGY11.460.46
+4.18%
Biogaia AB
CNBB44.15N/A
N/A
CNB Community Bancorp Inc.
MCUJF0.82N/A
N/A
Medicure Inc.
MONDY27.30-0.29
-1.05%
Mondi Plc.
DASTY32.56-0.35
-1.06%
Dassault Systemes SA

LVMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVMHF has been closely correlated with LVMUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 97% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVMHF jumps, then LVMUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVMHF
1D Price
Change %
LVMHF100%
-2.04%
LVMUY - LVMHF
97%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
HESAY - LVMHF
81%
Closely correlated
-3.36%
HESAF - LVMHF
72%
Closely correlated
-4.24%
PPRUY - LVMHF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
SWGAY - LVMHF
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
More

MNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNNGF and REAL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNNGF and REAL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNNGF
1D Price
Change %
MNNGF100%
N/A
REAL - MNNGF
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.18%
LVMHF - MNNGF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
DCOHF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNDZF - MNNGF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKFLF - MNNGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More