LVGLF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
VLMGF
Price
$0.64
Change
+$0.03 (+4.92%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVGLF vs VLMGF

Header iconLVGLF vs VLMGF Comparison
Open Charts LVGLF vs VLMGFBanner chart's image
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$57.73K
CapitalizationN/A
Viscount Mining
Price$0.64
Change+$0.03 (+4.92%)
Volume$165.16K
Capitalization13M
LVGLF vs VLMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVGLF vs. VLMGF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVGLF is a Hold and VLMGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (LVGLF: $0.14 vs. VLMGF: $0.65)
Brand notoriety: LVGLF and VLMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVGLF: 78% vs. VLMGF: 484%
Market capitalization -- LVGLF: $0 vs. VLMGF: $13M
LVGLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. VLMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVGLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLMGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLMGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLMGF is a better buy in the long-term than LVGLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVGLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLMGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • VLMGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLMGF is a better buy in the short-term than LVGLF.

Price Growth

LVGLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VLMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +15.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VLMGF YTD gains are higher at: 303.424 vs. LVGLF (30.762).
LVGLFVLMGFLVGLF / VLMGF
CapitalizationN/A13M-
EBITDAN/A-1.65M-
Gain YTD30.762303.42410%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A483K-
Total DebtN/A12.7K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVGLF vs VLMGF: Fundamental Ratings
LVGLF
VLMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10036
SMR RATING
1..100
9493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6234
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LVGLF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as VLMGF (63). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to VLMGF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LVGLF (100). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (94). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (62). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

VLMGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (100). This means that VLMGF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVGLFVLMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNBP89.991.99
+2.26%
Cornerstone Bancorp Inc.
SLVYY3.290.02
+0.61%
Solvay S.A.
IGESF0.09N/A
N/A
Igas Energy PLC
APMRF0.16N/A
N/A
Amper SA Madrid
AACAY5.05-0.14
-2.77%
AAC Technologies Holdings Inc

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVGLF has been loosely correlated with EREPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVGLF jumps, then EREPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
+6.11%
EREPF - LVGLF
36%
Loosely correlated
+32.78%
VLMGF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.26%
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.07%
CLLEF - LVGLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More

VLMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLMGF and TAJIF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLMGF and TAJIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLMGF
1D Price
Change %
VLMGF100%
+5.02%
TAJIF - VLMGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVGLF - VLMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.11%
VLMZF - VLMGF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USGDF - VLMGF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.25%
VGMIF - VLMGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More