LVGLF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
24.86M
PLGDF
Price
$1.10
Change
-$0.03 (-2.65%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
71.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVGLF vs PLGDF

Header iconLVGLF vs PLGDF Comparison
Open Charts LVGLF vs PLGDFBanner chart's image
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$217.34K
Capitalization24.86M
PALISADES GOLD
Price$1.10
Change-$0.03 (-2.65%)
Volume$6.1K
Capitalization71.04M
LVGLF vs PLGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVGLF vs. PLGDF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVGLF is a Hold and PLGDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LVGLF: $0.16 vs. PLGDF: $1.10)
Brand notoriety: LVGLF and PLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVGLF: 183% vs. PLGDF: 47%
Market capitalization -- LVGLF: $24.86M vs. PLGDF: $71.04M
LVGLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $24.86M. PLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVGLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LVGLF and PLGDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVGLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLGDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PLGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the short-term than PLGDF.

Price Growth

LVGLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.67% price change this week, while PLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLGDF($71M) has a higher market cap than LVGLF($24.9M). LVGLF YTD gains are higher at: 46.472 vs. PLGDF (18.906). LVGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.86M vs. PLGDF (-141.69M). PLGDF has more cash in the bank: 23.2M vs. LVGLF (114K). LVGLF (0) and PLGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LVGLFPLGDFLVGLF / PLGDF
Capitalization24.9M71M35%
EBITDA-1.86M-141.69M1%
Gain YTD46.47218.906246%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash114K23.2M0%
Total Debt1.02MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVGLF: Fundamental Ratings
LVGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVGLFPLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCNAF16.27N/A
N/A
Barco NV
BSDGY29.09N/A
N/A
Bosideng International Holdings Ltd.
MAAL1.37N/A
N/A
Marketing Alliance, Inc. (The)
SNGNF3.42-0.23
-6.25%
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd.
AGNMF0.11-0.01
-6.38%
AGRONOMICS LTD

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVGLF has been loosely correlated with EREPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVGLF jumps, then EREPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
-7.87%
EREPF - LVGLF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.84%
WGXRF - LVGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
FDMIF - LVGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More