LVGLF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
36.54M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OPHRF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.49M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LVGLF vs OPHRF

Header iconLVGLF vs OPHRF Comparison
Open Charts LVGLF vs OPHRFBanner chart's image
LAKE VICTORIA GOLD
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$222.77K
Capitalization36.54M
OPHIR METALS
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization2.49M
LVGLF vs OPHRF Comparison Chart in %
LVGLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OPHRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LVGLF vs. OPHRF commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVGLF is a Hold and OPHRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (LVGLF: $0.19 vs. OPHRF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: LVGLF and OPHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LVGLF: 91% vs. OPHRF: 21%
Market capitalization -- LVGLF: $36.54M vs. OPHRF: $2.49M
LVGLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $36.54M. OPHRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $143.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LVGLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOPHRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LVGLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OPHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LVGLF is a better buy in the long-term than OPHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LVGLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OPHRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LVGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OPHRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OPHRF is a better buy in the short-term than LVGLF.

Price Growth

LVGLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -5.27% price change this week, while OPHRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.04% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LVGLF($36.5M) has a higher market cap than OPHRF($2.49M). OPHRF YTD gains are higher at: -0.764 vs. LVGLF (-14.062). OPHRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -665.01K vs. LVGLF (-2.67M). LVGLF has more cash in the bank: 3.91M vs. OPHRF (2.14M). LVGLF (0) and OPHRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LVGLFOPHRFLVGLF / OPHRF
Capitalization36.5M2.49M1,465%
EBITDA-2.67M-665.01K402%
Gain YTD-14.062-0.7641,841%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.91M2.14M183%
Total Debt1.02MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LVGLF vs OPHRF: Fundamental Ratings
LVGLF
OPHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8883
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3765
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OPHRF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (42). This means that OPHRF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

OPHRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LVGLF (100). This means that OPHRF’s stock grew similarly to LVGLF’s over the last 12 months.

LVGLF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as OPHRF (98). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to OPHRF’s over the last 12 months.

LVGLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as OPHRF (65). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to OPHRF’s over the last 12 months.

LVGLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OPHRF (100). This means that LVGLF’s stock grew similarly to OPHRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LVGLFOPHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LVGLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OPHRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GJNSF17.52N/A
N/A
Gjensidige Forsikring Asa
NICFF22.86N/A
N/A
Nichias Corp.
TAPM0.16N/A
N/A
Tapinator, Inc.
FIGP19.00N/A
N/A
Forge Group Inc.
OILSF2.00-0.04
-1.96%
Saturn Oil & Gas Inc.

LVGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LVGLF and PLGDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LVGLF and PLGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LVGLF
1D Price
Change %
LVGLF100%
-0.37%
PLGDF - LVGLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-30.13%
CGLCF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
GRCAF - LVGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+10.92%
WGXRF - LVGLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
FDMIF - LVGLF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
More

OPHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OPHRF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OPHRF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OPHRF
1D Price
Change %
OPHRF100%
+4.41%
GSHRF - OPHRF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
XXMMF - OPHRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NESRF - OPHRF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BELGF - OPHRF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
LVGLF - OPHRF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More