It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LUV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVLRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LUV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LUV (@Airlines) experienced а -1.88% price change this week, while VLRS (@Airlines) price change was -0.48% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.01%.
LUV is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
VLRS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
LUV | VLRS | LUV / VLRS | |
Capitalization | 19.7B | 965M | 2,041% |
EBITDA | 1.87B | 522M | 359% |
Gain YTD | 15.633 | -10.661 | -147% |
P/E Ratio | 227.15 | 5.05 | 4,500% |
Revenue | 27.4B | 3.21B | 855% |
Total Cash | 9.38B | 821M | 1,143% |
Total Debt | 9.1B | 3.73B | 244% |
LUV | VLRS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VLRS's Valuation (62) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as LUV (83). This means that VLRS’s stock grew similarly to LUV’s over the last 12 months.
VLRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as LUV (100). This means that VLRS’s stock grew similarly to LUV’s over the last 12 months.
VLRS's SMR Rating (14) in the Airlines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LUV (89). This means that VLRS’s stock grew significantly faster than LUV’s over the last 12 months.
LUV's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as VLRS (45). This means that LUV’s stock grew similarly to VLRS’s over the last 12 months.
LUV's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Airlines industry is significantly better than the same rating for VLRS (100). This means that LUV’s stock grew significantly faster than VLRS’s over the last 12 months.
LUV | VLRS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago68% | 3 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUV has been loosely correlated with AAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUV jumps, then AAL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LUV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LUV | 100% | +0.37% | ||
AAL - LUV | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
ULCC - LUV | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
DAL - LUV | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
VLRS - LUV | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
ICAGY - LUV | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLRS has been loosely correlated with UAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VLRS jumps, then UAL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VLRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VLRS | 100% | -0.36% | ||
UAL - VLRS | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
CPA - VLRS | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
DAL - VLRS | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
ALK - VLRS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
AAL - VLRS | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More |