LUNMF
Price
$10.18
Change
-$0.09 (-0.88%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
10 days until earnings call
WLBMF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
60.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUNMF vs WLBMF

Header iconLUNMF vs WLBMF Comparison
Open Charts LUNMF vs WLBMFBanner chart's image
Lundin Mining
Price$10.18
Change-$0.09 (-0.88%)
Volume$31.89K
Capitalization6.88B
Wallbridge Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150.11K
Capitalization60.17M
LUNMF vs WLBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUNMF vs. WLBMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUNMF is a Hold and WLBMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LUNMF: $10.18 vs. WLBMF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: LUNMF and WLBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUNMF: 8% vs. WLBMF: 55%
Market capitalization -- LUNMF: $6.88B vs. WLBMF: $60.17M
LUNMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.88B. WLBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $60.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the long-term than WLBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUNMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLBMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUNMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WLBMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the short-term than WLBMF.

Price Growth

LUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.11% price change this week, while WLBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.18% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUNMF($6.88B) has a higher market cap than WLBMF($60.2M). LUNMF YTD gains are higher at: 18.235 vs. WLBMF (15.012). LUNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 903M vs. WLBMF (-7.36M). LUNMF has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. WLBMF (29.8M). WLBMF has less debt than LUNMF: WLBMF (26.3K) vs LUNMF (215M). LUNMF has higher revenues than WLBMF: LUNMF (2.8B) vs WLBMF (0).
LUNMFWLBMFLUNMF / WLBMF
Capitalization6.88B60.2M11,422%
EBITDA903M-7.36M-12,264%
Gain YTD18.23515.012121%
P/E Ratio31.55N/A-
Revenue2.8B0-
Total Cash184M29.8M617%
Total Debt215M26.3K817,490%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUNMF vs WLBMF: Fundamental Ratings
LUNMF
WLBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
9090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUNMF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLBMF (70). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (90). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as WLBMF (58). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew similarly to WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUNMF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WLBMF (100). This means that LUNMF’s stock grew significantly faster than WLBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUNMFWLBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WLBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YOLO2.270.11
+5.02%
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
RWL105.600.61
+0.58%
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
QBUF28.000.04
+0.16%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffr ETF - Qt
EVG11.03N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund
CMDT26.07-0.33
-1.25%
PIMCO Commodity Strategy Act Exc-Trd Fd

LUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNMF has been closely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUNMF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNMF
1D Price
Change %
LUNMF100%
-0.83%
IVPAF - LUNMF
74%
Closely correlated
-1.89%
CSCCF - LUNMF
73%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
GLNCY - LUNMF
71%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
GLCNF - LUNMF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
BDNNY - LUNMF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
More

WLBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLBMF and LUNMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLBMF and LUNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLBMF
1D Price
Change %
WLBMF100%
-9.52%
LUNMF - WLBMF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
AZMCF - WLBMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.81%
FGOVF - WLBMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
IVPAF - WLBMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
AAGFF - WLBMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
More