LUNMF
Price
$10.93
Change
-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
31 days until earnings call
SLVDF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.31M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUNMF vs SLVDF

Header iconLUNMF vs SLVDF Comparison
Open Charts LUNMF vs SLVDFBanner chart's image
Lundin Mining
Price$10.93
Change-$0.15 (-1.35%)
Volume$178.8K
Capitalization6.88B
Silver Dollar Resources
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.8K
Capitalization10.31M
LUNMF vs SLVDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUNMF vs. SLVDF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUNMF is a Hold and SLVDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LUNMF: $10.93 vs. SLVDF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: LUNMF and SLVDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUNMF: 48% vs. SLVDF: 39%
Market capitalization -- LUNMF: $6.88B vs. SLVDF: $10.31M
LUNMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.88B. SLVDF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $10.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUNMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LUNMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLVDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the long-term than SLVDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUNMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLVDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUNMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLVDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUNMF is a better buy in the short-term than SLVDF.

Price Growth

LUNMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while SLVDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNMF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUNMF($6.88B) has a higher market cap than SLVDF($10.3M). LUNMF YTD gains are higher at: 26.945 vs. SLVDF (-14.859). LUNMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 903M vs. SLVDF (-483.58K). LUNMF has more cash in the bank: 184M vs. SLVDF (5.29M). LUNMF has higher revenues than SLVDF: LUNMF (2.8B) vs SLVDF (0).
LUNMFSLVDFLUNMF / SLVDF
Capitalization6.88B10.3M66,757%
EBITDA903M-483.58K-186,731%
Gain YTD26.945-14.859-181%
P/E Ratio31.55N/A-
Revenue2.8B0-
Total Cash184M5.29M3,479%
Total Debt215MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUNMF: Fundamental Ratings
LUNMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUNMFSLVDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLVDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HYDR23.620.50
+2.16%
Global X Hydrogen ETF
PRF43.050.26
+0.61%
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
ONEV131.240.40
+0.31%
SPDR® Russell 1000 Low Vol Foc ETF
NJNK20.230.03
+0.15%
Columbia U.S. High Yield ETF
PTIN29.00-0.07
-0.22%
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF

LUNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNMF has been closely correlated with IVPAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUNMF jumps, then IVPAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNMF
1D Price
Change %
LUNMF100%
-1.35%
IVPAF - LUNMF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.69%
CSCCF - LUNMF
73%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
GLNCY - LUNMF
71%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
GLCNF - LUNMF
67%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
BDNNY - LUNMF
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.64%
More

SLVDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVDF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVDF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVDF
1D Price
Change %
SLVDF100%
+2.23%
PGEZF - SLVDF
31%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
LUNMF - SLVDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
AAGFF - SLVDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
AZZTF - SLVDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
ESKYF - SLVDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+19.46%
More