LUNG
Price
$1.74
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
70.9M
52 days until earnings call
XVIPF
Price
$20.54
Change
-$2.46 (-10.70%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
564.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUNG vs XVIPF

Header iconLUNG vs XVIPF Comparison
Open Charts LUNG vs XVIPFBanner chart's image
Pulmonx
Price$1.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$304.19K
Capitalization70.9M
Xvivo Perfusion AB
Price$20.54
Change-$2.46 (-10.70%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization564.62M
LUNG vs XVIPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XVIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUNG vs. XVIPF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUNG is a Hold and XVIPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LUNG: $1.74 vs. XVIPF: $20.54)
Brand notoriety: LUNG and XVIPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUNG: 41% vs. XVIPF: 129%
Market capitalization -- LUNG: $70.9M vs. XVIPF: $564.62M
LUNG [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $70.9M. XVIPF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $564.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUNG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXVIPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUNG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XVIPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUNG is a better buy in the long-term than XVIPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUNG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XVIPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • XVIPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XVIPF is a better buy in the short-term than LUNG.

Price Growth

LUNG (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while XVIPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.02% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XVIPF($565M) has a higher market cap than LUNG($70.9M). XVIPF YTD gains are higher at: -50.034 vs. LUNG (-74.374). XVIPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 182M vs. LUNG (-51.84M). XVIPF has more cash in the bank: 323M vs. LUNG (84.2M). LUNG has less debt than XVIPF: LUNG (56.8M) vs XVIPF (111M). XVIPF has higher revenues than LUNG: XVIPF (823M) vs LUNG (90.5M).
LUNGXVIPFLUNG / XVIPF
Capitalization70.9M565M13%
EBITDA-51.84M182M-28%
Gain YTD-74.374-50.034149%
P/E RatioN/A55.15-
Revenue90.5M823M11%
Total Cash84.2M323M26%
Total Debt56.8M111M51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XVIPF: Fundamental Ratings
XVIPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUNGXVIPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUNG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XVIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AINSF0.730.08
+12.88%
Ainsworth Game Technology Ltd.
SDSYA6.82N/A
N/A
South Dakota Soybean Processors, LLC
JGCCF9.05N/A
N/A
JGC Holdings Corporation
MSLOF33.51N/A
N/A
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd.
NOWVF0.25N/A
N/A
NowVertical Group Inc.

LUNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUNG has been loosely correlated with BDX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUNG jumps, then BDX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUNG
1D Price
Change %
LUNG100%
N/A
BDX - LUNG
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
UTMD - LUNG
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
KIDS - LUNG
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SNN - LUNG
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
IQV - LUNG
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
More

XVIPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XVIPF and INMD have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XVIPF and INMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XVIPF
1D Price
Change %
XVIPF100%
N/A
INMD - XVIPF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
LUNG - XVIPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VPTDF - XVIPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
OM - XVIPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.94%
USAQ - XVIPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.89%
More