LUGDF
Price
$57.27
Change
+$3.46 (+6.43%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
13.86B
87 days until earnings call
WPM
Price
$97.25
Change
-$3.44 (-3.42%)
Updated
Aug 11, 11:04 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
45.8B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs WPM

Header iconLUGDF vs WPM Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs WPMBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$57.27
Change+$3.46 (+6.43%)
Volume$27.3K
Capitalization13.86B
Wheaton Precious Metals
Price$97.25
Change-$3.44 (-3.42%)
Volume$6.86K
Capitalization45.8B
LUGDF vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. WPM commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a StrongBuy and WPM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $57.27 vs. WPM: $100.69)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF: Not notable vs. WPM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 56% vs. WPM: 170%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $13.86B vs. WPM: $45.8B
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.86B. WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $45.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $76.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than WPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WPM is a better buy in the short-term than LUGDF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +21.84% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4618.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

WPM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WPM($45.8B) has a higher market cap than LUGDF($13.9B). WPM has higher P/E ratio than LUGDF: WPM (58.00) vs LUGDF (25.80). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 176.574 vs. WPM (79.764). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.15B vs. WPM (1.04B). WPM has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. LUGDF (452M). WPM has less debt than LUGDF: WPM (8.09M) vs LUGDF (298M). WPM has higher revenues than LUGDF: WPM (1.46B) vs LUGDF (1.32B).
LUGDFWPMLUGDF / WPM
Capitalization13.9B45.8B30%
EBITDA1.15B1.04B111%
Gain YTD176.57479.764221%
P/E Ratio25.8058.0044%
Revenue1.32B1.46B91%
Total Cash452M1.09B42%
Total Debt298M8.09M3,685%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
216
SMR RATING
1..100
2076
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (55) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (16) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (76) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LUGDF (35) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to LUGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFST40.800.55
+1.37%
Southern First Bancshares
CDZIP17.610.11
+0.63%
Cadiz
LILA7.79-0.04
-0.51%
Liberty Latin America Ltd
KMX54.97-0.29
-0.52%
CarMax
CSTE1.63-0.02
-1.21%
Caesarstone Ltd

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+6.43%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More

WPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WPM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WPM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WPM
1D Price
Change %
WPM100%
+0.90%
AEM - WPM
91%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
FNV - WPM
83%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
KGC - WPM
82%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
RGLD - WPM
81%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
IAG - WPM
78%
Closely correlated
-2.85%
More