LUGDF
Price
$65.03
Change
-$0.83 (-1.26%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
15.75B
43 days until earnings call
WPM
Price
$107.61
Change
-$0.06 (-0.06%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
49.07B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs WPM

Header iconLUGDF vs WPM Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs WPMBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$65.03
Change-$0.83 (-1.26%)
Volume$34.41K
Capitalization15.75B
Wheaton Precious Metals
Price$107.61
Change-$0.06 (-0.06%)
Volume$2.83M
Capitalization49.07B
LUGDF vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. WPM commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a StrongBuy and WPM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $65.04 vs. WPM: $107.61)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF: Not notable vs. WPM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 39% vs. WPM: 135%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $15.75B vs. WPM: $49.07B
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.75B. WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $49.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than WPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WPM is a better buy in the short-term than LUGDF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.15% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2061.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

WPM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WPM($49.1B) has a higher market cap than LUGDF($15.7B). WPM has higher P/E ratio than LUGDF: WPM (61.99) vs LUGDF (25.60). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 217.785 vs. WPM (92.459). WPM has more cash in the bank: 1.01B vs. LUGDF (83M). WPM has less debt than LUGDF: WPM (8.25M) vs LUGDF (298M).
LUGDFWPMLUGDF / WPM
Capitalization15.7B49.1B32%
EBITDAN/A1.22B-
Gain YTD217.78592.459236%
P/E Ratio25.6061.9941%
RevenueN/A1.66B-
Total Cash83M1.01B8%
Total Debt298M8.25M3,613%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
216
SMR RATING
1..100
1969
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3640
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (61) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (16) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (69) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (40) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LUGDF (36) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to LUGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHA28.15-0.04
-0.14%
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
BJUN45.58-0.12
-0.26%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - June
EYLD37.36-0.18
-0.48%
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
SPXV73.28-0.48
-0.66%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Health Care
JSMD85.94-0.77
-0.89%
Janus Henderson Small/Md Cp Gr Alpha ETF

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
-1.27%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More