LUGDF
Price
$65.03
Change
-$0.83 (-1.26%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
15.75B
43 days until earnings call
SNWGF
Price
$7.57
Change
-$0.03 (-0.39%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs SNWGF

Header iconLUGDF vs SNWGF Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs SNWGFBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$65.03
Change-$0.83 (-1.26%)
Volume$34.41K
Capitalization15.75B
SNOWLINE GOLD
Price$7.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.39%)
Volume$105.23K
Capitalization1.31B
LUGDF vs SNWGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. SNWGF commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a StrongBuy and SNWGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $65.04 vs. SNWGF: $7.57)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF and SNWGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 39% vs. SNWGF: 116%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $15.75B vs. SNWGF: $1.31B
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.75B. SNWGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $97.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSNWGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SNWGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than SNWGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNWGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNWGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than SNWGF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.15% price change this week, while SNWGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +31.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2061.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.72% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($15.7B) has a higher market cap than SNWGF($1.31B). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 217.785 vs. SNWGF (111.338). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 83M vs. SNWGF (52M). SNWGF has less debt than LUGDF: SNWGF (256K) vs LUGDF (298M).
LUGDFSNWGFLUGDF / SNWGF
Capitalization15.7B1.31B1,198%
EBITDAN/A-31.39M-
Gain YTD217.785111.338196%
P/E Ratio25.60N/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash83M52M160%
Total Debt298M256K116,406%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFSNWGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNWGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMLR32.660.60
+1.87%
Semler Scientific
CIB52.580.07
+0.13%
Grupo Cibest SA
IVT29.450.01
+0.03%
InvenTrust Properties Corp
BDMD2.48-0.03
-1.20%
Baird Medical Investment Holdings Ltd
YCBD0.66-0.03
-3.84%
CBDMD Inc

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
-1.27%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
More

SNWGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNWGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNWGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNWGF
1D Price
Change %
SNWGF100%
-0.42%
TORXF - SNWGF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
LUGDF - SNWGF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
ORZCF - SNWGF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
KNTNF - SNWGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
PROBF - SNWGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
More