LUGDF
Price
$65.99
Change
+$1.07 (+1.65%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
15.99B
62 days until earnings call
RVLGF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.01 (-1.85%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
112.3M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs RVLGF

Header iconLUGDF vs RVLGF Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs RVLGFBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$65.99
Change+$1.07 (+1.65%)
Volume$73.96K
Capitalization15.99B
Revival Gold
Price$0.53
Change-$0.01 (-1.85%)
Volume$246.65K
Capitalization112.3M
LUGDF vs RVLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. RVLGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a StrongBuy and RVLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $65.99 vs. RVLGF: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF and RVLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 145% vs. RVLGF: 104%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $15.99B vs. RVLGF: $112.3M
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.99B. RVLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $112.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than RVLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than RVLGF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.75% price change this week, while RVLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +1.99% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($16B) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($112M). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 218.676 vs. RVLGF (162.438). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 493M vs. RVLGF (3.05M).
LUGDFRVLGFLUGDF / RVLGF
Capitalization16B112M14,286%
EBITDA1.03BN/A-
Gain YTD218.676162.438135%
P/E Ratio25.98N/A-
Revenue1.47BN/A-
Total Cash493M3.05M16,169%
Total Debt298MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs RVLGF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
RVLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2100
SMR RATING
1..100
1998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8544

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (64). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (98). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (35). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFRVLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYHRX41.890.49
+1.18%
Rydex Real Estate H
MSCDX18.940.20
+1.07%
MassMutual Small Cap Opps R5
CMNWX86.360.82
+0.96%
Principal Capital Appreciation A
GSPTX37.250.35
+0.95%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Inv
NGRRX34.710.20
+0.58%
Nuveen International Value I

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+1.64%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLGF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLGF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
-1.81%
TORXF - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
BCEKF - RVLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
WRLGF - RVLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
DPMLF - RVLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
LUGDF - RVLGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
More