LUGDF
Price
$81.96
Change
+$3.81 (+4.88%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
19.76B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NSUPF
Price
$1.59
Change
+$0.05 (+3.25%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Capitalization
276.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs NSUPF

Header iconLUGDF vs NSUPF Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs NSUPFBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$81.96
Change+$3.81 (+4.88%)
Volume$78.39K
Capitalization19.76B
Northern Superior Resources
Price$1.59
Change+$0.05 (+3.25%)
Volume$294.86K
Capitalization276.57M
LUGDF vs NSUPF Comparison Chart in %
LUGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NSUPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. NSUPF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a Buy and NSUPF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $81.96 vs. NSUPF: $1.59)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF and NSUPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 142% vs. NSUPF: 55%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $19.76B vs. NSUPF: $276.57M
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.76B. NSUPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $276.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $110.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileNSUPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • NSUPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than NSUPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSUPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NSUPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LUGDF and NSUPF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.41% price change this week, while NSUPF (@Precious Metals) price change was +16.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +7.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6505.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+7.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($19.8B) has a higher market cap than NSUPF($277M). NSUPF YTD gains are higher at: 362.371 vs. LUGDF (300.497). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. NSUPF (-16.45M). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 83M vs. NSUPF (9.94M). LUGDF has higher revenues than NSUPF: LUGDF (1.47B) vs NSUPF (0).
LUGDFNSUPFLUGDF / NSUPF
Capitalization19.8B277M7,148%
EBITDA1.03B-16.45M-6,261%
Gain YTD300.497362.37183%
P/E Ratio28.96N/A-
Revenue1.47B0-
Total Cash83M9.94M835%
Total Debt298MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs NSUPF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
NSUPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1916
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
440
SMR RATING
1..100
1999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (96). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NSUPF (40). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (99). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

NSUPF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LUGDF (35). This means that NSUPF’s stock grew similarly to LUGDF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSUPF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than NSUPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFNSUPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NSUPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMPIX65.750.95
+1.47%
ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Inv
RPGIX24.420.04
+0.16%
T. Rowe Price Global Industrials
ODIIX145.760.17
+0.12%
Invesco Discovery R6
GMLPX37.77-0.14
-0.37%
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras Instl
RYAKX63.02-0.28
-0.44%
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy A