LUGDF
Price
$61.59
Change
+$0.91 (+1.50%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
14.78B
65 days until earnings call
MAIFF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
149.6M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUGDF vs MAIFF

Header iconLUGDF vs MAIFF Comparison
Open Charts LUGDF vs MAIFFBanner chart's image
Lundin Gold
Price$61.59
Change+$0.91 (+1.50%)
Volume$41.51K
Capitalization14.78B
Minera Alamos
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$892.02K
Capitalization149.6M
LUGDF vs MAIFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUGDF vs. MAIFF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUGDF is a StrongBuy and MAIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (LUGDF: $61.59 vs. MAIFF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: LUGDF and MAIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUGDF: 80% vs. MAIFF: 99%
Market capitalization -- LUGDF: $14.78B vs. MAIFF: $149.6M
LUGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.78B. MAIFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $149.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $86.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUGDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMAIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MAIFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than MAIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUGDF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAIFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MAIFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the short-term than MAIFF.

Price Growth

LUGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.52% price change this week, while MAIFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3881.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUGDF($14.8B) has a higher market cap than MAIFF($150M). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 197.441 vs. MAIFF (45.029). LUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03B vs. MAIFF (-50.76M). LUGDF has more cash in the bank: 493M vs. MAIFF (7.51M). MAIFF has less debt than LUGDF: MAIFF (6.62M) vs LUGDF (298M). LUGDF has higher revenues than MAIFF: LUGDF (1.47B) vs MAIFF (9.93M).
LUGDFMAIFFLUGDF / MAIFF
Capitalization14.8B150M9,867%
EBITDA1.03B-50.76M-2,029%
Gain YTD197.44145.029438%
P/E Ratio24.15N/A-
Revenue1.47B9.93M14,847%
Total Cash493M7.51M6,561%
Total Debt298M6.62M4,502%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUGDF vs MAIFF: Fundamental Ratings
LUGDF
MAIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2100
SMR RATING
1..100
1999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3496
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5039

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAIFF (81). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAIFF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAIFF (100). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAIFF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MAIFF (99). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than MAIFF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MAIFF (60). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to MAIFF’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAIFF (96). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUGDFMAIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAIFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTE2.230.02
+0.90%
Baytex Energy Corp
LEVI22.370.11
+0.49%
Levi Strauss & Co
VIASP25.58-0.07
-0.27%
Via Renewables
AUID4.46-0.05
-1.22%
authID
BBCP6.96-0.11
-1.56%
Concrete Pumping Holdings

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+1.50%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+3.64%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.01%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+3.36%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.70%
WPM - LUGDF
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
More

MAIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAIFF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MAIFF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAIFF
1D Price
Change %
MAIFF100%
+2.09%
TORXF - MAIFF
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.30%
LGDTF - MAIFF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
BCEKF - MAIFF
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.06%
LUGDF - MAIFF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
WDOFF - MAIFF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
More