LUCMF
Price
$1.02
Change
-$0.05 (-4.67%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
268.59M
PGZFF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
34.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LUCMF vs PGZFF

Header iconLUCMF vs PGZFF Comparison
Open Charts LUCMF vs PGZFFBanner chart's image
LUCA MINING
Price$1.02
Change-$0.05 (-4.67%)
Volume$258.66K
Capitalization268.59M
Pan Global Resource
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$97.32K
Capitalization34.65M
LUCMF vs PGZFF Comparison Chart in %
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUCMF vs. PGZFF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUCMF is a Hold and PGZFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (LUCMF: $1.02 vs. PGZFF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: LUCMF and PGZFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUCMF: 71% vs. PGZFF: 76%
Market capitalization -- LUCMF: $268.59M vs. PGZFF: $34.65M
LUCMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $268.59M. PGZFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $34.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUCMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGZFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUCMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGZFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the long-term than PGZFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUCMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGZFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PGZFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LUCMF is a better buy in the short-term than PGZFF.

Price Growth

LUCMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PGZFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LUCMF($269M) has a higher market cap than PGZFF($34.7M). LUCMF YTD gains are higher at: 161.606 vs. PGZFF (52.173). LUCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -6.24M vs. PGZFF (-6.75M). LUCMF has more cash in the bank: 24.3M vs. PGZFF (2.46M). LUCMF has higher revenues than PGZFF: LUCMF (121M) vs PGZFF (0).
LUCMFPGZFFLUCMF / PGZFF
Capitalization269M34.7M775%
EBITDA-6.24M-6.75M92%
Gain YTD161.60652.173310%
P/E Ratio39.07N/A-
Revenue121M0-
Total Cash24.3M2.46M987%
Total Debt18MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LUCMF vs PGZFF: Fundamental Ratings
LUCMF
PGZFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGZFF's Valuation (61) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (76). This means that PGZFF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

PGZFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (100). This means that PGZFF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as PGZFF (99). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew similarly to PGZFF’s over the last 12 months.

PGZFF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LUCMF (44). This means that PGZFF’s stock grew similarly to LUCMF’s over the last 12 months.

LUCMF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PGZFF (100). This means that LUCMF’s stock grew significantly faster than PGZFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUCMFPGZFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LUCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGZFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSPFX27.300.13
+0.48%
Victory RS Partners A
PRZIX42.890.03
+0.07%
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock I
ELMFX19.98N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Emerging Markets Equity F
CIPNX21.56-0.01
-0.05%
Champlain Small Company Institutional
MASOX10.70-0.01
-0.09%
MoA Small Cap Equity Index Fund

LUCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCMF and AAGFF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCMF and AAGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCMF
1D Price
Change %
LUCMF100%
-4.32%
AAGFF - LUCMF
33%
Poorly correlated
-6.59%
AOTVF - LUCMF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
TECK - LUCMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
IPOAF - LUCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.44%
AGXPF - LUCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.39%
More

PGZFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGZFF and SGPTF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGZFF and SGPTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGZFF
1D Price
Change %
PGZFF100%
-1.31%
SGPTF - PGZFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.34%
NVLHF - PGZFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
PMMCF - PGZFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.82%
PNPNF - PGZFF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
LUCMF - PGZFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.32%
More