LUCD
Price
$1.22
Change
+$0.03 (+2.52%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.94M
20 days until earnings call
PLSE
Price
$17.12
Change
-$0.13 (-0.75%)
Updated
Mar 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
481.01M
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LUCD vs PLSE

Header iconLUCD vs PLSE Comparison
Open Charts LUCD vs PLSEBanner chart's image
Lucid Diagnostics
Price$1.22
Change+$0.03 (+2.52%)
Volume$4.78K
Capitalization42.94M
Pulse Biosciences
Price$17.12
Change-$0.13 (-0.75%)
Volume$1.46K
Capitalization481.01M
LUCD vs PLSE Comparison Chart
Loading...
LUCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LUCD vs. PLSE commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LUCD is a Buy and PLSE is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (LUCD: $1.19 vs. PLSE: $17.25)
Brand notoriety: LUCD and PLSE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LUCD: 136% vs. PLSE: 116%
Market capitalization -- LUCD: $42.94M vs. PLSE: $481.01M
LUCD [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $42.94M. PLSE’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $481.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LUCD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLSE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LUCD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLSE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUCD is a better buy in the long-term than PLSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LUCD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLSE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LUCD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PLSE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LUCD and PLSE are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LUCD (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -11.19% price change this week, while PLSE (@Medical Specialties) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

LUCD is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

PLSE is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-1.23% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLSE($481M) has a higher market cap than LUCD($42.9M). LUCD YTD gains are higher at: 45.352 vs. PLSE (-0.948). PLSE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -42.37M vs. LUCD (-49.75M). PLSE has more cash in the bank: 44.4M vs. LUCD (18.9M). PLSE has less debt than LUCD: PLSE (9.14M) vs LUCD (15.3M). LUCD has higher revenues than PLSE: LUCD (2.43M) vs PLSE (0).
LUCDPLSELUCD / PLSE
Capitalization42.9M481M9%
EBITDA-49.75M-42.37M117%
Gain YTD45.352-0.948-4,785%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue2.43M0-
Total Cash18.9M44.4M43%
Total Debt15.3M9.14M167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLSE: Fundamental Ratings
PLSE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
52
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
87
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUCDPLSE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LUCD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X78532.000000-2069.039000
-2.57%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY560.58-15.34
-2.66%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL227.48-11.59
-4.85%
Apple
GME22.42-1.58
-6.58%
GameStop Corp
TSLA222.15-40.52
-15.43%
Tesla

LUCD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LUCD and PAVM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LUCD and PAVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUCD
1D Price
Change %
LUCD100%
-14.39%
PAVM - LUCD
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.59%
MRCHF - LUCD
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWAY - LUCD
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
INBS - LUCD
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.26%
HBIO - LUCD
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
More

PLSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLSE and QDEL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLSE and QDEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLSE
1D Price
Change %
PLSE100%
-0.72%
QDEL - PLSE
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.20%
CERS - PLSE
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
MYO - PLSE
27%
Poorly correlated
-9.35%
BWAY - PLSE
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
MBOT - PLSE
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.52%
More