LU
Price
$3.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:16 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.43B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
XYF
Price
$14.13
Change
+$0.36 (+2.61%)
Updated
Oct 15, 11:15 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
562.97M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs XYF

Header iconLU vs XYF Comparison
Open Charts LU vs XYFBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$3.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.7K
Capitalization2.43B
X Financial
Price$14.13
Change+$0.36 (+2.61%)
Volume$137
Capitalization562.97M
LU vs XYF Comparison Chart in %
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. XYF commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Hold and XYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $3.65 vs. XYF: $13.77)
Brand notoriety: LU and XYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 132% vs. XYF: 41%
Market capitalization -- LU: $2.43B vs. XYF: $562.97M
LU [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.43B. XYF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $562.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $676.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileXYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • XYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, XYF is a better buy in the long-term than LU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • XYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XYF is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

LU (@Savings Banks) experienced а -5.68% price change this week, while XYF (@Savings Banks) price change was -3.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-1.10% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($2.43B) has a higher market cap than XYF($563M). LU has higher P/E ratio than XYF: LU (20.60) vs XYF (2.56). XYF YTD gains are higher at: 71.160 vs. LU (52.720). LU has higher revenues than XYF: LU (20.3B) vs XYF (3.15B).
LUXYFLU / XYF
Capitalization2.43B563M431%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD52.72071.16074%
P/E Ratio20.602.56806%
Revenue20.3B3.15B645%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XYF: Fundamental Ratings
XYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
12
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUXYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKJCX3.33N/A
N/A
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr C
REAIX25.93N/A
N/A
American Century Real Estate I
MSVMX5.97N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Vitality Portfolio C
OPOCX107.93N/A
N/A
Invesco Discovery A
VSFIX25.23N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value IS

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with FINV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then FINV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-3.44%
FINV - LU
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
YRD - LU
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
QFIN - LU
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
LX - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
XYF - LU
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
More

XYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XYF has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XYF jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XYF
1D Price
Change %
XYF100%
+2.46%
QFIN - XYF
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
LX - XYF
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
YRD - XYF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
FINV - XYF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
LU - XYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
More