LU
Price
$2.79
Change
+$0.06 (+2.19%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.09B
57 days until earnings call
RMIAF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs RMIAF

Header iconLU vs RMIAF Comparison
Open Charts LU vs RMIAFBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$2.79
Change+$0.06 (+2.19%)
Volume$21.86K
Capitalization5.09B
Automotive Fin
Price$0.76
Change+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization10.32M
LU vs RMIAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. RMIAF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Buy and RMIAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $2.74 vs. RMIAF: $0.76)
Brand notoriety: LU and RMIAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 61% vs. RMIAF: 104%
Market capitalization -- LU: $5.09B vs. RMIAF: $10.32M
LU [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.09B. RMIAF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $10.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRMIAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RMIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than RMIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMIAF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RMIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMIAF is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

LU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -1.79% price change this week, while RMIAF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.61% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($5.09B) has a higher market cap than RMIAF($10.3M). RMIAF YTD gains are higher at: 38.081 vs. LU (14.644). RMIAF has less debt than LU: RMIAF (27.6M) vs LU (43.1B). LU has higher revenues than RMIAF: LU (32B) vs RMIAF (929K).
LURMIAFLU / RMIAF
Capitalization5.09B10.3M49,427%
EBITDAN/A27.7K-
Gain YTD14.64438.08138%
P/E Ratio19.53N/A-
Revenue32B929K3,444,564%
Total CashN/A22M-
Total Debt43.1B27.6M156,159%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RMIAF: Fundamental Ratings
RMIAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
76
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LURMIAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLPEY9.130.19
+2.10%
Galp Energia, SA
FMCCT21.810.31
+1.42%
Freddie Mac
PEGRY13.550.08
+0.59%
Pennon Group PLC
ATCMF0.09N/A
N/A
Atico Mining Corp
CVONF0.05N/A
N/A
Carnarvon Energy Limited

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-1.79%
QFIN - LU
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
FINV - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
YRD - LU
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
LX - LU
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
DWAY - LU
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RMIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMIAF and VEL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMIAF and VEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMIAF
1D Price
Change %
RMIAF100%
N/A
VEL - RMIAF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
LU - RMIAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
MCVT - RMIAF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNKKY - RMIAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAURY - RMIAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More