LU
Price
$2.74
Change
-$0.05 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
57 days until earnings call
PT
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs PT

Header iconLU vs PT Comparison
Open Charts LU vs PTBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$2.74
Change-$0.05 (-1.79%)
Volume$2.08M
Capitalization5.09B
Pintec Technology Holdings
Price$0.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.06K
Capitalization17.38M
LU vs PT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. PT commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Buy and PT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $2.74 vs. PT: $0.90)
Brand notoriety: LU and PT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 61% vs. PT: 29%
Market capitalization -- LU: $5.09B vs. PT: $17.38M
LU [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.09B. PT’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $17.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than PT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PT is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

LU (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -1.79% price change this week, while PT (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +3.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+3.75% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($5.09B) has a higher market cap than PT($17.4M). LU YTD gains are higher at: 14.644 vs. PT (-0.033). PT has less debt than LU: PT (400M) vs LU (43.1B). LU has higher revenues than PT: LU (32B) vs PT (173M).
LUPTLU / PT
Capitalization5.09B17.4M29,259%
EBITDAN/A-57.14M-
Gain YTD14.644-0.033-43,940%
P/E Ratio19.53N/A-
Revenue32B173M18,497%
Total CashN/A231M-
Total Debt43.1B400M10,775%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PT: Fundamental Ratings
PT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TGVAX30.350.30
+1.00%
Thornburg International Equity A
BTLSX9.190.07
+0.77%
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsInstl
ABCYX22.300.11
+0.50%
American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq Y
CIMFX26.440.05
+0.19%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529F1
GSGRX47.52-0.02
-0.04%
Goldman Sachs Equity Income A

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-1.79%
QFIN - LU
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
FINV - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
YRD - LU
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
LX - LU
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
DWAY - LU
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PT and LU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PT and LU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PT
1D Price
Change %
PT100%
N/A
LU - PT
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
MCVT - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UHAL - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
AER - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
RKT - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
More