LU
Price
$2.79
Change
-$0.04 (-1.41%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.41B
14 days until earnings call
PT
Price
$0.90
Change
-$0.02 (-2.17%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
14.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs PT

Header iconLU vs PT Comparison
Open Charts LU vs PTBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$2.79
Change-$0.04 (-1.41%)
Volume$10.22K
Capitalization2.41B
Pintec Technology Holdings
Price$0.90
Change-$0.02 (-2.17%)
Volume$4.73K
Capitalization14.35M
LU vs PT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. PT commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Hold and PT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $2.83 vs. PT: $0.92)
Brand notoriety: LU and PT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 51% vs. PT: 23%
Market capitalization -- LU: $2.41B vs. PT: $14.35M
LU [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.41B. PT’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $14.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $651.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $21.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than PT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • PT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PT is a better buy in the short-term than LU.

Price Growth

LU (@Savings Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PT (@Savings Banks) price change was -2.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.19% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LU($2.41B) has a higher market cap than PT($14.4M). LU YTD gains are higher at: 18.410 vs. PT (2.188).
LUPTLU / PT
Capitalization2.41B14.4M16,715%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.4102.188841%
P/E Ratio20.61N/A-
Revenue20.3BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PT: Fundamental Ratings
PT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUPT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARTLX15.140.11
+0.73%
Artisan Value Investor
PASRX20.720.09
+0.44%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R
FANIX47.430.13
+0.27%
Fidelity Advisor Energy I
MINFX38.640.08
+0.21%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R2
BSVSX15.58-0.19
-1.20%
Baird Equity Opportunity Investor

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with LX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then LX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
+0.35%
LX - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
YRD - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
QFIN - LU
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
FINV - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.36%
QD - LU
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
More

PT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PT and LU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PT and LU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PT
1D Price
Change %
PT100%
+1.04%
LU - PT
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
UHAL - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
MCVT - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.92%
AER - PT
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
QD - PT
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.68%
More