LU
Price
$3.41
Change
-$0.01 (-0.29%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.43B
76 days until earnings call
MIUFY
Price
$16.38
Change
-$0.12 (-0.73%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs MIUFY

Header iconLU vs MIUFY Comparison
Open Charts LU vs MIUFYBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$3.41
Change-$0.01 (-0.29%)
Volume$4M
Capitalization2.43B
Mitsubishi HC Capital
Price$16.38
Change-$0.12 (-0.73%)
Volume$181
Capitalization12.01B
LU vs MIUFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. MIUFY commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Buy and MIUFY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $3.41 vs. MIUFY: $16.38)
Brand notoriety: LU and MIUFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 171% vs. MIUFY: 63%
Market capitalization -- LU: $2.43B vs. MIUFY: $12.01B
LU [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.43B. MIUFY’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $12.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $657.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMIUFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MIUFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the long-term than MIUFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIUFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MIUFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the short-term than MIUFY.

Price Growth

LU (@Savings Banks) experienced а +14.81% price change this week, while MIUFY (@Savings Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+1.68% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIUFY($12B) has a higher market cap than LU($2.43B). LU has higher P/E ratio than MIUFY: LU (20.61) vs MIUFY (12.91). LU YTD gains are higher at: 42.678 vs. MIUFY (32.632). LU has less debt than MIUFY: LU (47.6B) vs MIUFY (7.99T). MIUFY has higher revenues than LU: MIUFY (2.08T) vs LU (20.3B).
LUMIUFYLU / MIUFY
Capitalization2.43B12B20%
EBITDAN/A576B-
Gain YTD42.67832.632131%
P/E Ratio20.6112.91160%
Revenue20.3B2.08T1%
Total CashN/A385B-
Total Debt47.6B7.99T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIUFY: Fundamental Ratings
MIUFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUMIUFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MLP19.720.81
+4.28%
Maui Land & Pineapple Co
CVGI1.72N/A
N/A
Commercial Vehicle Group
CCIXU10.66N/A
N/A
Churchill Capital Corp IX
ROCK61.17-0.61
-0.98%
Gibraltar Industries
ELAN18.54-0.49
-2.57%
Elanco Animal Health

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
-0.29%
QFIN - LU
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.57%
YRD - LU
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
LX - LU
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
FINV - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
XYF - LU
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
More

MIUFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIUFY and EDNMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIUFY and EDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIUFY
1D Price
Change %
MIUFY100%
N/A
EDNMF - MIUFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAURY - MIUFY
12%
Poorly correlated
-12.18%
SIXGF - MIUFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNKKY - MIUFY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LU - MIUFY
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
More