LU
Price
$3.07
Change
-$0.01 (-0.32%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.42B
96 days until earnings call
MIUFY
Price
$16.38
Change
-$0.12 (-0.73%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
11.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LU vs MIUFY

Header iconLU vs MIUFY Comparison
Open Charts LU vs MIUFYBanner chart's image
Lufax Holding
Price$3.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.32%)
Volume$2.68M
Capitalization2.42B
Mitsubishi HC Capital
Price$16.38
Change-$0.12 (-0.73%)
Volume$181
Capitalization11.71B
LU vs MIUFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LU vs. MIUFY commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LU is a Buy and MIUFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (LU: $3.08 vs. MIUFY: $16.38)
Brand notoriety: LU and MIUFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LU: 151% vs. MIUFY: 64%
Market capitalization -- LU: $2.42B vs. MIUFY: $11.71B
LU [@Savings Banks] is valued at $2.42B. MIUFY’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $11.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $681.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $22.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LU’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMIUFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LU’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MIUFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MIUFY is a better buy in the long-term than LU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MIUFY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MIUFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LU is a better buy in the short-term than MIUFY.

Price Growth

LU (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.65% price change this week, while MIUFY (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

LU is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.29% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIUFY($11.7B) has a higher market cap than LU($2.42B). LU has higher P/E ratio than MIUFY: LU (20.61) vs MIUFY (12.82). MIUFY YTD gains are higher at: 32.632 vs. LU (28.870). LU has less debt than MIUFY: LU (47.6B) vs MIUFY (7.99T). MIUFY has higher revenues than LU: MIUFY (2.08T) vs LU (20.3B).
LUMIUFYLU / MIUFY
Capitalization2.42B11.7B21%
EBITDAN/A576B-
Gain YTD28.87032.63288%
P/E Ratio20.6112.82161%
Revenue20.3B2.08T1%
Total CashN/A385B-
Total Debt47.6B7.99T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MIUFY: Fundamental Ratings
MIUFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LUMIUFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MIUFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNRCX42.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Energy C
GQGIX17.05-0.02
-0.12%
GQG Partners Emerging Markets EquityInst
BRSHX14.42-0.06
-0.41%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq C
TADCX25.43-0.18
-0.70%
Transamerica US Growth C
GLNMX25.07-0.27
-1.07%
MFS Global New Discovery R4

LU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LU has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LU jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LU
1D Price
Change %
LU100%
+4.76%
QFIN - LU
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
YRD - LU
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
LX - LU
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.47%
FINV - LU
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
XYF - LU
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
More

MIUFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MIUFY and EDNMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MIUFY and EDNMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MIUFY
1D Price
Change %
MIUFY100%
N/A
EDNMF - MIUFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAURY - MIUFY
12%
Poorly correlated
-5.34%
SIXGF - MIUFY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZNKKY - MIUFY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LU - MIUFY
-1%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
More