LTUM
Price
$0.19
Change
+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Updated
Oct 20 closing price
Capitalization
22.41M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MACQF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.25M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTUM vs MACQF

Header iconLTUM vs MACQF Comparison
Open Charts LTUM vs MACQFBanner chart's image
Lithium
Price$0.19
Change+$0.01 (+5.56%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization22.41M
Themac Resources Group
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.03K
Capitalization4.25M
LTUM vs MACQF Comparison Chart in %
LTUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MACQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTUM vs. MACQF commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTUM is a Hold and MACQF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (LTUM: $0.19 vs. MACQF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: LTUM and MACQF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTUM: 64% vs. MACQF: 14%
Market capitalization -- LTUM: $22.41M vs. MACQF: $4.25M
LTUM [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $22.41M. MACQF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $4.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTUM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMACQF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LTUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MACQF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LTUM is a better buy in the long-term than MACQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTUM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MACQF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTUM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MACQF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MACQF is a better buy in the short-term than LTUM.

Price Growth

LTUM (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -23.96% price change this week, while MACQF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +30.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +194.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.19% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTUM($22.4M) has a higher market cap than MACQF($4.25M). LTUM YTD gains are higher at: 425.719 vs. MACQF (62.963). LTUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -640.82K vs. MACQF (-1.48M). LTUM has more cash in the bank: 2.92M vs. MACQF (149K). LTUM (0) and MACQF (0) have equivalent revenues.
LTUMMACQFLTUM / MACQF
Capitalization22.4M4.25M528%
EBITDA-640.82K-1.48M43%
Gain YTD425.71962.963676%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.92M149K1,962%
Total DebtN/A189M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTUM vs MACQF: Fundamental Ratings
LTUM
MACQF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96100
SMR RATING
1..100
99100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3473
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MACQF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTUM (91). This means that MACQF’s stock grew significantly faster than LTUM’s over the last 12 months.

LTUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MACQF (100). This means that LTUM’s stock grew similarly to MACQF’s over the last 12 months.

LTUM's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as MACQF (100). This means that LTUM’s stock grew similarly to MACQF’s over the last 12 months.

LTUM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MACQF (73). This means that LTUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MACQF’s over the last 12 months.

LTUM's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MACQF (100). This means that LTUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than MACQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTUMMACQF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MACQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNGGF0.880.02
+2.25%
Mongolia Growth Group Ltd.
BPIRF9.03N/A
N/A
Piraeus Financial Holdings S.A.
SNGSF0.07N/A
N/A
Singamas Container Holdings Ltd.
AFBOF11.05N/A
N/A
African Rainbow Minerals Ltd.
FMOO65.00N/A
N/A
F&M Bancorp

LTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTUM and LTRBF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTUM and LTRBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTUM
1D Price
Change %
LTUM100%
+5.61%
LTRBF - LTUM
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MACQF - LTUM
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTMCF - LTUM
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
LRAXF - LTUM
4%
Poorly correlated
+21.12%
LQRCF - LTUM
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.02%
More

MACQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MACQF and JZRIF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MACQF and JZRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MACQF
1D Price
Change %
MACQF100%
N/A
JZRIF - MACQF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.72%
MQMIF - MACQF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
MIDLF - MACQF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMP - MACQF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
PTNDF - MACQF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More