LTOUF
Price
$41.00
Change
+$0.60 (+1.49%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
55.49B
NWSZF
Price
$0.83
Change
-$0.11 (-11.70%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTOUF vs NWSZF

Header iconLTOUF vs NWSZF Comparison
Open Charts LTOUF vs NWSZFBanner chart's image
Larsen & Toubro
Price$41.00
Change+$0.60 (+1.49%)
Volume$170
Capitalization55.49B
CTF Services
Price$0.83
Change-$0.11 (-11.70%)
Volume$104
Capitalization3.98B
LTOUF vs NWSZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTOUF vs. NWSZF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTOUF is a Buy and NWSZF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (LTOUF: $41.00 vs. NWSZF: $0.83)
Brand notoriety: LTOUF and NWSZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTOUF: 69% vs. NWSZF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LTOUF: $55.49B vs. NWSZF: $3.98B
LTOUF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $55.49B. NWSZF’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $3.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTOUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWSZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LTOUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWSZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWSZF is a better buy in the long-term than LTOUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTOUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LTOUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LTOUF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NWSZF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +201.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.30% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTOUF($55.5B) has a higher market cap than NWSZF($3.98B). LTOUF has higher P/E ratio than NWSZF: LTOUF (31.31) vs NWSZF (11.42). LTOUF YTD gains are higher at: -9.217 vs. NWSZF (-11.659). LTOUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 321B vs. NWSZF (6.29B). LTOUF has higher revenues than NWSZF: LTOUF (2.63T) vs NWSZF (24.6B).
LTOUFNWSZFLTOUF / NWSZF
Capitalization55.5B3.98B1,394%
EBITDA321B6.29B5,103%
Gain YTD-9.217-11.65979%
P/E Ratio31.3111.42274%
Revenue2.63T24.6B10,683%
Total CashN/A28.5B-
Total DebtN/A35.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTOUF vs NWSZF: Fundamental Ratings
LTOUF
NWSZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4833
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1278
SMR RATING
1..100
5210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5375
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7961
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWSZF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTOUF (75). This means that NWSZF’s stock grew significantly faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NWSZF (78). This means that LTOUF’s stock grew significantly faster than NWSZF’s over the last 12 months.

NWSZF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTOUF (52). This means that NWSZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as NWSZF (75). This means that LTOUF’s stock grew similarly to NWSZF’s over the last 12 months.

NWSZF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as LTOUF (79). This means that NWSZF’s stock grew similarly to LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTOUFNWSZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MHO156.913.06
+1.99%
M/I Homes
TRUE2.160.04
+1.89%
TrueCar
SSYS10.240.06
+0.59%
Stratasys Ltd
BANL0.71N/A
N/A
CBL International Limited
SYY82.45-0.06
-0.07%
Sysco Corp

LTOUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTOUF has been loosely correlated with DNERF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTOUF jumps, then DNERF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTOUF
1D Price
Change %
LTOUF100%
N/A
DNERF - LTOUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWSGY - LTOUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAJMY - LTOUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLUY - LTOUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSZF - LTOUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWSZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NWSZF and NWSGY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NWSZF and NWSGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWSZF
1D Price
Change %
NWSZF100%
N/A
NWSGY - NWSZF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCR - NWSZF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
KAJMY - NWSZF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLRGF - NWSZF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBAGF - NWSZF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More