LTOUF
Price
$37.00
Change
+$1.25 (+3.50%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
59.06B
NWSGY
Price
$9.17
Change
+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTOUF vs NWSGY

Header iconLTOUF vs NWSGY Comparison
Open Charts LTOUF vs NWSGYBanner chart's image
Larsen & Toubro
Price$37.00
Change+$1.25 (+3.50%)
Volume$302
Capitalization59.06B
CTF Services
Price$9.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
Volume$403
Capitalization3.8B
LTOUF vs NWSGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTOUF vs. NWSGY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTOUF is a Hold and NWSGY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LTOUF: $36.21 vs. NWSGY: $9.17)
Brand notoriety: LTOUF and NWSGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTOUF: 100% vs. NWSGY: 165%
Market capitalization -- LTOUF: $59.06B vs. NWSGY: $3.8B
LTOUF [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $59.06B. NWSGY’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $3.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.31T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTOUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNWSGY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LTOUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NWSGY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWSGY is a better buy in the long-term than LTOUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTOUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWSGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTOUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NWSGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWSGY is a better buy in the short-term than LTOUF.

Price Growth

LTOUF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.14% price change this week, while NWSGY (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +27.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +200.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+27.60% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTOUF($59.1B) has a higher market cap than NWSGY($3.81B). LTOUF has higher P/E ratio than NWSGY: LTOUF (29.12) vs NWSGY (12.63). NWSGY YTD gains are higher at: 11.843 vs. LTOUF (-18.949).
LTOUFNWSGYLTOUF / NWSGY
Capitalization59.1B3.81B1,553%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-18.94911.843-160%
P/E Ratio29.1212.63231%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTOUF vs NWSGY: Fundamental Ratings
LTOUF
NWSGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1228
SMR RATING
1..100
5110
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8545
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWSGY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTOUF (73). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

LTOUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NWSGY (28). This means that LTOUF’s stock grew similarly to NWSGY’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTOUF (51). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as LTOUF (60). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew similarly to LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

NWSGY's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTOUF (85). This means that NWSGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTOUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTOUFNWSGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTOUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWSGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EOT16.250.12
+0.74%
EATON VANCE NATIONAL Municipal OPPORTUNITIES TRUST
SUSC23.16N/A
N/A
iShares ESG USD Corporate Bond ETF
ESIX28.99N/A
N/A
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
IBIK25.75-0.02
-0.08%
iShares Trust iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF
UGA60.03-0.45
-0.74%
United States Gasoline

LTOUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTOUF has been loosely correlated with DNERF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTOUF jumps, then DNERF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTOUF
1D Price
Change %
LTOUF100%
N/A
DNERF - LTOUF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NWSGY - LTOUF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KAJMY - LTOUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLUY - LTOUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSZF - LTOUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NWSGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWSGY has been loosely correlated with TNISF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NWSGY jumps, then TNISF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWSGY
1D Price
Change %
NWSGY100%
N/A
TNISF - NWSGY
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DNERF - NWSGY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOPHY - NWSGY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWSZF - NWSGY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLLUY - NWSGY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More