LTMCF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
69.71M
PILBF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.03 (-1.87%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTMCF vs PILBF

Header iconLTMCF vs PILBF Comparison
Open Charts LTMCF vs PILBFBanner chart's image
Lithium Chile
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.02K
Capitalization69.71M
PILBARA MINERALS
Price$1.57
Change-$0.03 (-1.87%)
Volume$30.4K
Capitalization5.05B
LTMCF vs PILBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PILBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTMCF vs. PILBF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTMCF is a Hold and PILBF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LTMCF: $0.34 vs. PILBF: $1.57)
Brand notoriety: LTMCF and PILBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTMCF: 58% vs. PILBF: 30%
Market capitalization -- LTMCF: $69.71M vs. PILBF: $5.05B
LTMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $69.71M. PILBF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $5.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTMCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePILBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LTMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PILBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PILBF is a better buy in the long-term than LTMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTMCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PILBF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PILBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PILBF is a better buy in the short-term than LTMCF.

Price Growth

LTMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.42% price change this week, while PILBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PILBF($5.05B) has a higher market cap than LTMCF($69.7M). LTMCF has higher P/E ratio than PILBF: LTMCF (46.86) vs PILBF (22.08). PILBF YTD gains are higher at: 17.895 vs. LTMCF (-37.982). PILBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 75.3M vs. LTMCF (-2.93M). PILBF has more cash in the bank: 975M vs. LTMCF (448K). PILBF has higher revenues than LTMCF: PILBF (890M) vs LTMCF (0).
LTMCFPILBFLTMCF / PILBF
Capitalization69.7M5.05B1%
EBITDA-2.93M75.3M-4%
Gain YTD-37.98217.895-212%
P/E Ratio46.8622.08212%
Revenue0890M-
Total Cash448K975M0%
Total DebtN/A682M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTMCF vs PILBF: Fundamental Ratings
LTMCF
PILBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8669
SMR RATING
1..100
8895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
157
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PILBF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTMCF (79). This means that PILBF’s stock grew significantly faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

PILBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as LTMCF (86). This means that PILBF’s stock grew similarly to LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PILBF (95). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to PILBF’s over the last 12 months.

PILBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (91). This means that PILBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

PILBF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as LTMCF (15). This means that PILBF’s stock grew similarly to LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTMCFPILBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PILBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBSFY2.280.03
+1.33%
UbiSoft Entertainment Inc.
SOCLF0.30N/A
N/A
Pharos Energy PLC
NNFSF6.89N/A
N/A
NONGFU SPRING CO LTD.
RANJF43.66N/A
N/A
Randstad NV
GUER1.20-0.06
-4.76%
Guerrilla RF, Inc.

LTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTMCF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTMCF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTMCF
1D Price
Change %
LTMCF100%
-0.24%
PILBF - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
PMETF - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
GLCNF - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
GLNCY - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
LYSCF - LTMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
More

PILBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PILBF has been loosely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PILBF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PILBF
1D Price
Change %
PILBF100%
-2.00%
LYSDY - PILBF
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
PMETF - PILBF
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
GLNCY - PILBF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
SOUHY - PILBF
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
MALRY - PILBF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
More